Wall Modeling of Turbulent Flows with Various Pressure Gradients Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning Wall Model Large-Eddy Simulation Pressure Gradient Skin Friction

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors propose a framework for developing wall models for large-eddy simulation (LES) using multi-agent reinforcement learning
  • Framework utilizes distributed reinforcement learning agents to adjust wall eddy viscosity based on off-wall environmental states
  • Model training is conducted in-situ with wall-modeled LES grid resolutions, not relying on high-fidelity simulations
  • Agents compute rewards from relative error in estimating wall-shear stress to refine optimal control policy
  • Trained models successfully capture acceleration and deceleration of wall-bounded turbulent flows under pressure gradients
  • Outperform equilibrium wall model in predicting skin friction
  • Study provides context by discussing existing experimental data and computational approaches for simulating flow around bumps
  • Comparison between simulations using equilibrium wall model (EQWM) and reinforcement learning wall model (RLWM) highlights improved performance of RLWM
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Di Zhou, H. Jane Bae

arXiv: 2305.02540v2 - DOI (physics.flu-dyn)
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2211.16427
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We propose a framework for developing wall models for large-eddy simulation that is able to capture pressure-gradient effects using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Within this framework, the distributed reinforcement learning agents receive off-wall environmental states including pressure gradient and turbulence strain rate, ensuring adaptability to a wide range of flows characterized by pressure-gradient effects and separations. Based on these states, the agents determine an action to adjust the wall eddy viscosity, and consequently the wall-shear stress. The model training is in-situ with wall-modeled large-eddy simulation grid resolutions and does not rely on the instantaneous velocity fields from high-fidelity simulations. Throughout the training, the agents compute rewards from the relative error in the estimated wall-shear stress, which allows the agents to refine an optimal control policy that minimizes prediction errors. Employing this framework, wall models are trained for two distinct subgrid-scale models using low-Reynolds-number flow over periodic hills. These models are validated through simulations of flows over periodic hills at higher Reynolds numbers and flow over the Boeing Gaussian bump. The developed wall models successfully capture the acceleration and deceleration of wall-bounded turbulent flows under pressure gradients and outperform the equilibrium wall model in predicting skin friction.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02540v2

In this study, the authors propose a framework for developing wall models for large-eddy simulation (LES) that can effectively capture pressure-gradient effects using multi-agent reinforcement learning. The framework utilizes distributed reinforcement learning agents that receive off-wall environmental states, including pressure gradient and turbulence strain rate, allowing adaptability to a wide range of flows characterized by pressure-gradient effects and separations. The agents in the framework determine an action to adjust the wall eddy viscosity based on these states, thereby influencing the wall-shear stress. Importantly, the model training is conducted in-situ with wall-modeled LES grid resolutions and does not rely on instantaneous velocity fields from high-fidelity simulations. Throughout the training process, the agents compute rewards from the relative error in estimating the wall-shear stress. This allows them to refine an optimal control policy that minimizes prediction errors. To validate their approach, the authors train wall models for two distinct subgrid-scale models using low-Reynolds-number flow over periodic hills. These trained models are then tested through simulations of flows over periodic hills at higher Reynolds numbers and flow over the Boeing Gaussian bump. The results demonstrate that the developed wall models successfully capture acceleration and deceleration of wall-bounded turbulent flows under pressure gradients and outperform equilibrium wall model in predicting skin friction. In addition to their proposed framework, this study provides further context by discussing existing experimental data available for validating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes and various computational approaches used for simulating flow around bumps. Previous studies have evaluated and compared methods such as Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS), direct numerical simulation (DNS), hybrid LES–DNS, WMLES (wall–modeled LES), and detached–eddy simulations (DES). Specifically, previous WMLES studies have shown that classical equilibrium wall models (EQWM) still have limitations in accurately predicting separation bubbles and peak values of skin friction. To address these limitations, a detailed comparison between simulations using EQWM and their developed reinforcement learning wall model (RLWM) is conducted which includes evaluating mean skin friction, mean pressure on bump surface as well as prediction of velocity field. The results highlight improved performance of RLWM compared to EQWM. Overall, this study presents a novel framework for developing wall models in large–eddy simulation that effectively captures pressure–gradient effects using multi–agent reinforcement learning. The validation results demonstrate its superiority over traditional equilibrium wall models in predicting skin friction and accurately simulating flows under pressure gradients.
Created on 08 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.