The GECKOS survey: Jeans anisotropic models of edge-on discs uncover the impact of dust and kinematic structures

AI-generated keywords: GECKOS survey

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study titled "The GECKOS survey: Jeans anisotropic models of edge-on discs uncover the impact of dust and kinematic structures" by T. H. Rutherford et al.
  • Investigating intricate stellar structures in central regions of disc galaxies, including nuclear discs, bars, bulges, and boxy-peanut (BP) bulges
  • Utilizing data from the GECKOS-MUSE survey to evaluate how dust affects axisymmetric Jeans Anisotropic Multi-Gaussian Expansion (JAM) models
  • Constructing JAM models for seven edge-on galaxies with varying characteristics to observe non-axisymmetric structure
  • Notable findings include consistent dynamical masses across different levels of dust masking, identification of bar orbits in NGC 3957, a bar in IC 1711, and hints at a possible side-on bar in NGC 0522
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: T. H. Rutherford, A. Fraser-McKelvie, E. Emsellem, J. van de Sande, S. M. Croom, A. Poci, M. Martig, D. A. Gadotti, F. Pinna, L. M. Valenzuela, G. van de Ven, J. Bland-Hawthorn, P. Das, T. A. Davis, R. Elliott, D. B. Fisher, M. R. Hayden, A. Mailvaganam, S. Sharma, T. Zafar

arXiv: 2509.08371v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
13 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract: The central regions of disc galaxies host a rich variety of stellar structures: nuclear discs, bars, bulges, and boxy-peanut (BP) bulges. These components are often difficult to disentangle, both photometrically and kinematically, particularly in star-forming galaxies where dust obscuration and complex stellar motions complicate interpretation. In this work, we use data from the GECKOS-MUSE survey to investigate the impact of dust on axisymmetric Jeans Anisotropic Multi-Gaussian Expansion (JAM) models, and assess their ability to recover kinematic structure in edge-on disc galaxies. We construct JAM models for a sample of seven edge-on ($i \gtrapprox 85^\circ$) galaxies that span a range of star formation rates, dust content, and kinematic complexity. We find that when dust is appropriately masked, the disc regions of each galaxy are fit to $\chi^2_{\text{reduced}}\leq 5$. We analyse two-dimensional residual velocity fields to identify signatures of non-axisymmetric structure. We find that derived dynamical masses are constant within 10% for each galaxy across all dust masking levels. In NGC 3957, a barred boxy galaxy in our sample, we identify velocity residuals that persist even under aggressive dust masking, aligned with bar orbits and supported by photometric bar signatures. We extend this analysis to reveal a bar in IC 1711 and a possible side-on bar in NGC 0522. Our results highlight both the capabilities and limitations of JAM in dusty, edge-on systems and attempt to link residual velocities to known non-axisymmetric kinematic structure.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Sep. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2509.08371v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In their study titled "The GECKOS survey: Jeans anisotropic models of edge-on discs uncover the impact of dust and kinematic structures," T. H. Rutherford et al. explore the intricate stellar structures found in the central regions of disc galaxies, including nuclear discs, bars, bulges, and boxy-peanut (BP) bulges. These components present challenges for disentanglement both photometrically and kinematically, particularly in star-forming galaxies where dust obscuration and complex stellar motions complicate interpretation. By utilizing data from the GECKOS-MUSE survey, the team focuses on investigating how dust affects axisymmetric Jeans Anisotropic Multi-Gaussian Expansion (JAM) models and evaluates their effectiveness in recovering kinematic structure in edge-on disc galaxies. Through constructing JAM models for a sample of seven edge-on galaxies with varying star formation rates, dust content, and kinematic complexities (with inclinations greater than or equal to 85 degrees), the researchers make significant observations. By properly masking dust effects, they are able to fit the disc regions of each galaxy to reduced chi-squared values less than or equal to 5. Analysis of two-dimensional residual velocity fields reveals telltale signs of non-axisymmetric structure within these galaxies. Interestingly, dynamical masses remain consistent within a 10% margin across all levels of dust masking for each galaxy. One notable case involves NGC 3957—a barred boxy galaxy in their sample—where persistent velocity residuals are identified even under aggressive dust masking. These residuals align with bar orbits and are supported by photometric bar signatures. Furthermore, extending their analysis reveals a bar in IC 1711 and hints at a possible side-on bar in NGC 0522. Overall, this study sheds light on both the capabilities and limitations of JAM models when applied to dusty edge-on systems. The researchers attempt to establish connections between residual velocities and known non-axisymmetric kinematic structures within these galaxies. This research, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics journal, consists of 13 pages and 13 figures. , , , , and are the five keywords that summarize the main focus of this study.
Created on 22 Sep. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.