Systematic biases in determining dust attenuation curves through galaxy SED fitting
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study investigates systematic biases in determining dust attenuation curves through galaxy spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting
- Focus on understanding relationship between slope of dust attenuation curve ($\delta$) and effective dust attenuation ($A_V$)
- Analyze sample of local star-forming galaxies (SFGs) from Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey and mock galaxy SEDs
- Best-fitting $\beta_0$ for SFGs shows wider coverage compared to starburst with constant star formation
- Strong degeneracies between $\beta_0$, $\delta$, and $A_V$ in SED fitting process
- Degeneracies induce systematic biases leading to false correlation between $A_V$ and $\delta$
- Simulation tests using input model galaxy SEDs with flat $A_V$-$\delta$ relation reproduce observed correlation
- Variations in best-fitting $\delta$ primarily due to fitting errors rather than true physical differences
- Assuming starburst with constant star formation results in steeper attenuation curve, smaller degeneracy errors, and stronger $A_V$-$\delta$ relation
- Apparent $A_V$-$\delta$ relation likely driven by systematic biases induced by fitting degeneracies
- Importance of considering degeneracy effects in SED fitting when determining dust attenuation curves
Authors: Jianbo Qin, Xian Zhong Zheng, Min Fang, Zhizheng Pan, Stijn Wuyts, Yong Shi, Yingjie Peng, Valentino Gonzalez, Fuyan Bian, Jia-Sheng Huang, Qiu-Sheng Gu, Wenhao Liu, Qinghua Tan, Dong Dong Shi, Jian Ren, Yuheng Zhang, Man Qiao, Run Wen, Shuang Liu
Abstract: While the slope of the dust attenuation curve ($\delta$) is found to correlate with effective dust attenuation ($A_V$) as obtained through spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, it remains unknown how the fitting degeneracies shape this relation. We examine the degeneracy effects by fitting SEDs of a sample of local star-forming galaxies (SFGs) selected from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey, in conjunction with mock galaxy SEDs of known attenuation parameters. A well-designed declining starburst star formation history is adopted to generate model SED templates with intrinsic UV slope ($\beta_0$) spanning over a reasonably wide range. The best-fitting $\beta_0$ for our sample SFGs shows a wide coverage, dramatically differing from the limited range of $\beta_0<-2.2$ for a starburst of constant star formation. Our results show that strong degeneracies between $\beta_0$, $\delta$, and $A_V$ in the SED fitting induce systematic biases leading to a false $A_V$--$\delta$ correlation. Our simulation tests reveal that this relationship can be well reproduced even when a flat $A_V$--$\delta$ relation is taken to build the input model galaxy SEDs. The variations in best-fitting $\delta$ are dominated by the fitting errors. We show that assuming a starburst with constant star formation in SED fitting will result in a steeper attenuation curve, smaller degeneracy errors, and a stronger $A_V$--$\delta$ relation. Our findings confirm that the $A_V$--$\delta$ relation obtained through SED fitting is likely driven by the systematic biases induced by the fitting degeneracies between $\beta_0$, $\delta$, and $A_V$.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.