Les Dissonances: Cross-Tool Harvesting and Polluting in Multi-Tool Empowered LLM Agents
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Large Language Model (LLM) agents are autonomous systems powered by LLMs and capable of reasoning and planning solutions using multiple tools.
- Challenges related to secure tool management, compatibility assurance, handling dependency relationships, and safeguarding control flows exist in multi-tool-enabled LLM agents.
- The research focuses on conducting a security analysis on task control flows within these agents, uncovering the threat of Cross-Tool Harvesting and Polluting (XTHP).
- XTHP involves attack vectors aimed at hijacking control flows to gather and contaminate confidential information within LLM agent systems.
- The authors introduce Chord, a dynamic scanning tool to identify real-world agent tools vulnerable to XTHP attacks.
- Evaluation of 66 tools from LangChain and LlamaIndex repositories revealed that 75% were susceptible to XTHP attacks.
- Addressing security vulnerabilities in multi-tool-enabled LLM agents is crucial to mitigate risks such as unauthorized access, data breaches, and information pollution.
Authors: Zichuan Li, Jian Cui, Xiaojing Liao, Luyi Xing
Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are autonomous systems powered by LLMs, capable of reasoning and planning to solve problems by leveraging a set of tools. However, the integration of multi-tool capabilities in LLM agents introduces challenges in securely managing tools, ensuring their compatibility, handling dependency relationships, and protecting control flows within LLM agent workflows. In this paper, we present the first systematic security analysis of task control flows in multi-tool-enabled LLM agents. We identify a novel threat, Cross-Tool Harvesting and Polluting (XTHP), which includes multiple attack vectors to first hijack the normal control flows of agent tasks, and then collect and pollute confidential or private information within LLM agent systems. To understand the impact of this threat, we developed Chord, a dynamic scanning tool designed to automatically detect real-world agent tools susceptible to XTHP attacks. Our evaluation of 66 real-world tools from the repositories of two major LLM agent development frameworks, LangChain and LlamaIndex, revealed a significant security concern: 75\% are vulnerable to XTHP attacks, highlighting the prevalence of this threat.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.