Limitations of Amplitude Encoding on Quantum Classification

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Machine Learning Amplitude Encoding Limitations Data Representation Optimization Algorithms

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Xin Wang, Yabo Wang, Bo Qi, Rebing Wu
  • Topic: Limitations of Amplitude Encoding on Quantum Classification
  • Key Points:
  • Quantum machine learning (QML) shows promise for complex problems
  • Amplitude encoding is a common technique but has limitations
  • Quantum states encoded via amplitude tend to concentrate towards specific state
  • Concentration phenomenon creates loss barrier for quantum classifiers
  • Loss function reaches lower bound hindering classification accuracy improvement
  • Training error may paradoxically rise with increased training data volume
  • Diminished gains in prediction accuracy on new data sets due to unexpected behavior
  • Need for more efficient encoding techniques in QML to unlock full potential
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xin Wang, Yabo Wang, Bo Qi, Rebing Wu

arXiv: 2503.01545v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
18 pages, 11 figures

Abstract: It remains unclear whether quantum machine learning (QML) has real advantages when dealing with practical and meaningful tasks. Encoding classical data into quantum states is one of the key steps in QML. Amplitude encoding has been widely used owing to its remarkable efficiency in encoding a number of $2^{n}$ classical data into $n$ qubits simultaneously. However, the theoretical impact of amplitude encoding on QML has not been thoroughly investigated. In this work we prove that under some broad and typical data assumptions, the average of encoded quantum states via amplitude encoding tends to concentrate towards a specific state. This concentration phenomenon severely constrains the capability of quantum classifiers as it leads to a loss barrier phenomenon, namely, the loss function has a lower bound that cannot be improved by any optimization algorithm. In addition, via numerical simulations, we reveal a counterintuitive phenomenon of amplitude encoding: as the amount of training data increases, the training error may increase rather than decrease, leading to reduced decrease in prediction accuracy on new data. Our results highlight the limitations of amplitude encoding in QML and indicate that more efforts should be devoted to finding more efficient encoding strategies to unlock the full potential of QML.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.01545v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Limitations of Amplitude Encoding on Quantum Classification," authors Xin Wang, Yabo Wang, Bo Qi, and Rebing Wu delve into the realm of quantum machine learning (QML) to explore the efficacy of amplitude encoding in quantum classification tasks. While QML holds promise for tackling complex real-world problems, the authors highlight a critical limitation associated with amplitude encoding - a widely used technique for encoding classical data into quantum states. The study reveals that under common data assumptions, quantum states encoded via amplitude encoding tend to concentrate towards a specific state. This concentration phenomenon poses a significant challenge for quantum classifiers by creating a loss barrier that cannot be overcome through optimization algorithms. In essence, the loss function reaches a lower bound that hinders further improvement in classification accuracy. Moreover, through numerical simulations, the authors uncover a counterintuitive outcome of amplitude encoding: as the volume of training data increases, the training error may paradoxically rise instead of decreasing. This unexpected behavior leads to diminished gains in prediction accuracy on new data sets and highlights the limitations of current encoding strategies in QML. Overall, these findings underscore the need for more efficient encoding techniques in quantum machine learning to unlock its full potential. By addressing these limitations and exploring alternative approaches to data representation, researchers can enhance the performance and applicability of quantum classifiers in practical and meaningful tasks.
Created on 24 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.