Talking Turns: Benchmarking Audio Foundation Models on Turn-Taking Dynamics

AI-generated keywords: Audio Foundation Models Turn-Taking Dynamics Conversational Modeling Evaluation Protocol Spoken Dialogue Systems

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Siddhant Arora, Zhiyun Lu, Chung-Cheng Chiu, Ruoming Pang, and Shinji Watanabe explore the potential of audio foundation models (FMs) in enhancing conversational modeling.
  • The study addresses the lack of comprehensive evaluation of FMs in facilitating natural and interactive conversations.
  • Importance of FMs engaging in fluent turn-taking without speech overlap or prolonged silence for meaningful interactions.
  • Introduction of a novel evaluation protocol involving a supervised model to assess turn-taking proficiency in spoken dialog systems.
  • User study reveals issues such as failure to discern speaking cues, aggressive interruptions, and lack of backchanneling in existing systems.
  • Evaluation extends to multiple open-source and proprietary audio FMs sourced from Switchboard to measure comprehension and forecasting of turn-taking events.
  • Plan to release the evaluation platform as an open-source resource to advance conversational AI systems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Siddhant Arora, Zhiyun Lu, Chung-Cheng Chiu, Ruoming Pang, Shinji Watanabe

Accepted at ICLR 2025

Abstract: The recent wave of audio foundation models (FMs) could provide new capabilities for conversational modeling. However, there have been limited efforts to evaluate these audio FMs comprehensively on their ability to have natural and interactive conversations. To engage in meaningful conversation with the end user, we would want the FMs to additionally perform a fluent succession of turns without too much overlapping speech or long stretches of silence. Inspired by this, we ask whether the recently proposed audio FMs can understand, predict, and perform turn-taking events? To answer this, we propose a novel evaluation protocol that can assess spoken dialog system's turn-taking capabilities using a supervised model as a judge that has been trained to predict turn-taking events in human-human conversations. Using this protocol, we present the first comprehensive user study that evaluates existing spoken dialogue systems on their ability to perform turn-taking events and reveal many interesting insights, such as they sometimes do not understand when to speak up, can interrupt too aggressively and rarely backchannel. We further evaluate multiple open-source and proprietary audio FMs accessible through APIs on carefully curated test benchmarks from Switchboard to measure their ability to understand and predict turn-taking events and identify significant room for improvement. We will open source our evaluation platform to promote the development of advanced conversational AI systems.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.01174v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Talking Turns: Benchmarking Audio Foundation Models on Turn-Taking Dynamics," authors Siddhant Arora, Zhiyun Lu, Chung-Cheng Chiu, Ruoming Pang, and Shinji Watanabe explore the potential of audio foundation models (FMs) in enhancing conversational modeling. The study addresses the lack of comprehensive evaluation of these FMs in their ability to facilitate natural and interactive conversations. The researchers emphasize the importance of FMs being able to engage in fluent turn-taking without excessive speech overlap or prolonged periods of silence to ensure meaningful interactions with users. To assess the capability of recently proposed audio FMs in understanding, predicting, and executing turn-taking events, the authors introduce a novel evaluation protocol. This protocol involves utilizing a supervised model trained to predict turn-taking events in human-human conversations as a judge to evaluate spoken dialog systems' turn-taking proficiency. Through this approach, the researchers conduct a thorough user study that sheds light on existing spoken dialogue systems' performance in turn-taking scenarios. They uncover insights such as instances where systems fail to discern appropriate speaking cues, exhibit overly aggressive interruptions, and lack adequate backchanneling. Furthermore, the study extends its evaluation to multiple open-source and proprietary audio FMs accessible via APIs by subjecting them to meticulously curated test benchmarks sourced from Switchboard. The goal is to measure these models' capacity to comprehend and forecast turn-taking events while identifying areas for enhancement. Ultimately, the researchers plan to release their evaluation platform as an open-source resource to foster advancements in conversational AI systems. Accepted at ICLR 2025, this research contributes valuable insights into the evolving landscape of audio foundation models and their potential impact on improving conversational interactions through enhanced turn-taking dynamics.
Created on 06 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.