Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1904.13015v1

The paper titled "Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluators" discusses the limitations of existing end-to-end open domain dialog systems, which are primarily trained with a maximum likelihood objective. These systems often suffer from lack of generalizability and the generic response problem, where the system generates responses that can be applied to a wide range of user utterances without providing specific or engaging answers. To address these issues, the authors propose a system that evaluates chatbot responses at each turn for coherence and engagement. This system provides explicit turn-level dialog quality feedback, which has been found to be highly correlated with human evaluation. The goal is to use this feedback as a signal for mitigating the aforementioned problems and improving the overall quality of the dialog system by selecting responses from different approaches. To demonstrate the effectiveness of incorporating explicit feedback into neural response generation models, two mechanisms are presented: reranking and direct modification of the loss function during training. These mechanisms aim to improve dialog quality by incorporating the feedback into the model's decision-making process. The authors conducted studies to evaluate their proposed approach in an open-domain spoken dialog setting. The results show that response generation models that incorporate both reranking and direct modification produce more engaging and coherent responses compared to traditional models trained with maximum likelihood objective alone. This improvement is observed through both automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation. Overall, this paper presents a novel approach to enhance end-to-end open domain dialog systems by incorporating explicit feedback on coherence and engagement at each turn. The proposed mechanisms effectively improve response quality, addressing issues related to lack of generalizability and generic responses commonly seen in such systems.

• - Existing end-to-end open domain dialog systems trained with maximum likelihood objective have limitations
• - Lack of generalizability and generic response problem are common issues in these systems
• - Authors propose a system that evaluates chatbot responses for coherence and engagement at each turn
• - Turn-level dialog quality feedback is highly correlated with human evaluation
• - Feedback is used to mitigate problems and improve the overall quality of the dialog system
• - Two mechanisms presented: reranking and direct modification of loss function during training
• - Studies show that incorporating explicit feedback improves response generation models
• - Models incorporating both reranking and direct modification produce more engaging and coherent responses compared to traditional models
• - Improvement observed through automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation
• - Proposed approach enhances end-to-end open domain dialog systems by incorporating explicit feedback on coherence and engagement at each turn

Existing end-to-end open domain dialog systems trained with maximum likelihood objective have limitations: This means that current chatbot systems have some problems. Lack of generalizability and generic response problem are common issues in these systems: Chatbots often struggle to understand different topics and give unique responses. Authors propose a system that evaluates chatbot responses for coherence and engagement at each turn: The authors suggest a way to check if the chatbot's answers make sense and keep the conversation interesting. Turn-level dialog quality feedback is highly correlated with human evaluation: Feedback on how well the chatbot is doing in each part of the conversation matches what humans think. Feedback is used to mitigate problems and improve the overall quality of the dialog system: The feedback helps fix any issues and make the chatbot better overall.

Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluators

End-to-end open domain dialog systems are increasingly becoming popular for providing automated customer service or conversational agents. However, these systems often suffer from lack of generalizability and the generic response problem, where the system generates responses that can be applied to a wide range of user utterances without providing specific or engaging answers. To address these issues, researchers have proposed a novel approach to enhance end-to-end open domain dialog systems by incorporating explicit feedback on coherence and engagement at each turn. This paper titled "Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluators" discusses this approach in detail.

Background

Open domain dialog systems are typically trained with a maximum likelihood objective which has been found to be inadequate for generating coherent and engaging responses. As such, there is an increasing need for methods that can improve the quality of generated responses in terms of coherence and engagement. The authors propose a system that evaluates chatbot responses at each turn for coherence and engagement as one way to address this issue. This system provides explicit turn-level dialog quality feedback which has been found to be highly correlated with human evaluation. The goal is to use this feedback as a signal for mitigating the aforementioned problems and improving the overall quality of the dialog system by selecting responses from different approaches.

Proposed Approach

To demonstrate the effectiveness of incorporating explicit feedback into neural response generation models, two mechanisms are presented: reranking and direct modification of the loss function during training. Reranking involves sorting generated candidate responses based on their predicted scores from automatic conversation evaluators while direct modification adjusts model parameters so that higher scores correspond to better rewards during training time optimization process (i.e., gradient descent). These mechanisms aim to improve dialog quality by incorporating the feedback into the model's decision-making process instead of relying solely on maximum likelihood objectives used in traditional models.

Evaluation Results

The authors conducted studies to evaluate their proposed approach in an open-domain spoken dialog setting using both automatic evaluation metrics (BLEU score) as well as human evaluation (mean opinion score). The results show that response generation models that incorporate both reranking and direct modification produce more engaging and coherent responses compared to traditional models trained with maximum likelihood objective alone; thus demonstrating improvement in terms of both automatic metrics as well as human evaluations..

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents a novel approach towards enhancing end-to-end open domain dialog systems by incorporating explicit feedback on coherence and engagement at each turn through two proposed mechanisms: reranking & direct modification of loss functions during training time optimization process (i.e., gradient descent). The results obtained through experiments demonstrate significant improvements over traditional models trained with maximum likelihood objectives alone; thus addressing issues related to lack of generalizability & generic responses commonly seen in such systems