When Uncertainty Leads to Unsafety: Empirical Insights into the Role of Uncertainty in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Safety

AI-generated keywords: UAV Safety Uncertainty Flight Supervisor Superialist Empirical Investigation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Safety challenges faced by autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) despite advancements in safety features
  • Gap in previous research on the relationship between behavioral uncertainty of UAVs and unsafety of flights
  • Large-scale empirical study using PX4-Autopilot software platform with over 5,000 simulated flights
  • Findings: Up to 89% of unsafe UAV states exhibited significant decision uncertainty; up to 74% of uncertain decisions led to unsafe states
  • Development of Superialist, a runtime uncertainty detector based on autoencoders, with high precision and recall rates for detecting uncertain behaviors
  • Early prediction of unsafe states up to 50 seconds in advance using Superialist
  • Need for future research on misbehavior prediction using combinations of black box and white box indicators
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sajad Khatiri, Fatemeh Mohammadi Amin, Sebastiano Panichella, Paolo Tonella

36 pages
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Despite the recent developments in obstacle avoidance and other safety features, autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) continue to face safety challenges. No previous work investigated the relationship between the behavioral uncertainty of a UAV and the unsafety of its flight. By quantifying uncertainty, it is possible to develop a predictor for unsafety, which acts as a flight supervisor. We conducted a large-scale empirical investigation of safety violations using PX4-Autopilot, an open-source UAV software platform. Our dataset of over 5,000 simulated flights, created to challenge obstacle avoidance, allowed us to explore the relation between uncertain UAV decisions and safety violations: up to 89% of unsafe UAV states exhibit significant decision uncertainty, and up to 74% of uncertain decisions lead to unsafe states. Based on these findings, we implemented Superialist (Supervising Autonomous Aerial Vehicles), a runtime uncertainty detector based on autoencoders, the state-of-the-art technology for anomaly detection. Superialist achieved high performance in detecting uncertain behaviors with up to 96% precision and 93% recall. Despite the observed performance degradation when using the same approach for predicting unsafety (up to 74% precision and 87% recall), Superialist enabled early prediction of unsafe states up to 50 seconds in advance.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jan. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2501.08908v1

In their study titled "When Uncertainty Leads to Unsafety: Empirical Insights into the Role of Uncertainty in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Safety," Sajad Khatiri, Fatemeh Mohammadi Amin, Sebastiano Panichella, and Paolo Tonella address the ongoing safety challenges faced by autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) despite advancements in obstacle avoidance and other safety features. The researchers highlight a gap in previous research regarding the relationship between behavioral uncertainty of UAVs and the unsafety of their flights. By quantifying uncertainty, they aim to develop a predictor for unsafety that can act as a flight supervisor. To investigate this issue, the team conducted a large-scale empirical study using PX4-Autopilot, an open-source UAV software platform. They analyzed a dataset comprising over 5,000 simulated flights designed to test obstacle avoidance capabilities. Their findings revealed that up to 89% of unsafe UAV states exhibited significant decision uncertainty, with up to 74% of uncertain decisions leading to unsafe states. Building on these results, the researchers developed Superialist (Supervising Autonomous Aerial Vehicles), a runtime uncertainty detector based on autoencoders—a state-of-the-art technology for anomaly detection. Superialist demonstrated high performance in detecting uncertain behaviors with precision rates reaching up to 96% and recall rates up to 93%. While there was some performance degradation when using the same approach for predicting unsafety (up to 74% precision and 87% recall), Superialist enabled early prediction of unsafe states up to 50 seconds in advance. Furthermore, the experimental results highlighted two key findings: uncertain decisions may potentially lead to safety violations but with exceptions; black box metrics prove accurate predictors of uncertain behaviors. However, a notable proportion of unsafe states did not show signs of uncertainty, indicating the need for future research on misbehavior prediction using combinations of black box and white box indicators. Overall, this study contributes significantly by conducting the first data-driven empirical investigation into UAV safety violations and exploring the relationship between uncertain and unsafe states in UAV operations. The findings shed light on the importance of addressing uncertainty in decision-making processes for enhancing autonomous UAV safety measures.
Created on 03 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.