Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical Scenarios

AI-generated keywords: Autonomous driving systems critical scenarios safety and reliability testing industry practices collaborative approaches

AI-generated Key Points

Study focuses on industry practices for challenging autonomous driving systems with critical scenarios
Complexity of testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is highlighted
Limited joint efforts in the industry to explore different approaches and tools for critical scenario identification
Importance of understanding what is considered critical and how to select these scenarios due to infinite possible scenarios
Different approaches proposed for critical scenario identification: experts, naturalistic driving data, guided search
Taxonomy categorizes approaches into four categories: exploration without parameter trajectory, exploration with parameter trajectories, induced learning from existing data sources, deductive learning using domain expertise
Methodology used for conducting interviews outlined in the article
Recommendations include combining different approaches, collaborating among stakeholders, continuously learning to enhance safety and reliability testing practices within the industry

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Qunying Song, Emelie Engström, Per Runeson

arXiv: 2305.14146v1 - DOI (cs.SE)

29 pages, 3 figures, submitted to a journal

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is extremely complex. A primary challenge is identifying the relevant test scenarios, especially the critical ones that may expose hazards or risks of harm to autonomous vehicles and other road users. There are several proposed methods and tools for critical scenario identification, while the industry practices, such as the selection, implementation, and limitations of the approaches, are not well understood. In this study, we conducted 10 interviews with 13 interviewees from 7 companies in autonomous driving in Sweden. We used thematic modeling to analyse and synthesize the interview data. We found there are little joint efforts in the industry to explore different approaches and tools, and every approach has its own limitations and weaknesses. To that end, we recommend combining different approaches available, collaborating among different stakeholders, and continuously learning the field of critical scenario identification and testing. The contributions of our study are the exploration and synthesis of the industry practices and related challenges for critical scenario identification and testing, and the potential increase of the industry relevance for future studies in related topics.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.14146v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

This study focuses on the industry practices for challenging autonomous driving systems with critical scenarios. The complexity of testing these systems for safety and reliability is highlighted, particularly in identifying relevant test scenarios that may expose hazards or risks to both autonomous vehicles and other road users. Through 10 interviews with 13 participants from 7 companies in Sweden involved in autonomous driving, thematic modeling was used to analyze the data. The results revealed limited joint efforts in the industry to explore different approaches and tools for critical scenario identification. In the related work section, various studies on critical scenario identification are discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding what is considered critical and how to select these scenarios due to the infinite number of possible scenarios in operational environments. Different approaches are proposed, including using experts, naturalistic driving data, or guided search. A taxonomy based on a systematic literature review categorizes these approaches into four categories: exploration without parameter trajectory, exploration with parameter trajectories, induced learning from existing data sources, and deductive learning using domain expertise. The methodology used for conducting interviews is outlined in this article along with a detailed list of interview participants and their respective lengths and formats. The structured approach taken during interviews aimed at setting a basis/context for progressive discussions. Overall, this study contributes to exploring industry practices and challenges related to critical scenario identification and testing for autonomous driving systems. Recommendations include combining different approaches, collaborating among stakeholders, and continuously learning in this field to enhance safety and reliability testing practices within the industry.

- Study focuses on industry practices for challenging autonomous driving systems with critical scenarios
- Complexity of testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is highlighted
- Limited joint efforts in the industry to explore different approaches and tools for critical scenario identification
- Importance of understanding what is considered critical and how to select these scenarios due to infinite possible scenarios
- Different approaches proposed for critical scenario identification: experts, naturalistic driving data, guided search
- Taxonomy categorizes approaches into four categories: exploration without parameter trajectory, exploration with parameter trajectories, induced learning from existing data sources, deductive learning using domain expertise
- Methodology used for conducting interviews outlined in the article
- Recommendations include combining different approaches, collaborating among stakeholders, continuously learning to enhance safety and reliability testing practices within the industry

Summary- The study looks at how to test self-driving cars in tough situations. - Testing these cars for safety and reliability is very hard. - Not many companies work together to find the best ways to identify tough scenarios. - It's important to know what situations are critical and how to pick them out from many possibilities. - There are different ways to find tough scenarios, like using experts or real driving data. Definitions- Autonomous driving systems: Cars that can drive by themselves without a human controlling them. - Scenarios: Different situations or events that can happen. - Critical: Very important or serious. - Identification: Finding or recognizing something. - Taxonomy: A way of organizing things into groups based on their similarities.

Introduction

The development of autonomous driving systems (ADS) has been a major focus in the automotive industry in recent years. These systems have the potential to revolutionize transportation by increasing safety, efficiency, and accessibility on our roads. However, with this new technology comes the challenge of ensuring its safety and reliability through rigorous testing. In order to properly test ADS, it is crucial to identify critical scenarios that may expose hazards or risks to both autonomous vehicles and other road users. This is a complex task due to the infinite number of possible scenarios that can occur in real-world environments. In this research paper, titled "Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical Scenarios," a study was conducted to explore how companies in Sweden are approaching this challenge.

Methodology

The researchers used thematic modeling to analyze data collected from 10 interviews with 13 participants from 7 companies involved in autonomous driving in Sweden. The methodology used for conducting these interviews is outlined in detail within the paper, including information about the interview participants and their respective lengths and formats. A structured approach was taken during the interviews, aiming at setting a basis/context for progressive discussions. This allowed for a deeper understanding of industry practices and challenges related to critical scenario identification and testing for ADS.

Results

The results revealed limited joint efforts among companies in Sweden when it comes to exploring different approaches and tools for critical scenario identification. This highlights the need for collaboration among stakeholders in order to enhance safety and reliability testing practices within the industry. In addition, various studies on critical scenario identification were discussed in relation to their approaches and methodologies. It was found that there are four main categories of approaches: exploration without parameter trajectory, exploration with parameter trajectories, induced learning from existing data sources, and deductive learning using domain expertise.

Exploration without Parameter Trajectory

This approach involves exploring scenarios without any predefined parameters or trajectories. It relies on the expertise and intuition of the individuals conducting the exploration.

Exploration with Parameter Trajectories

In this approach, scenarios are explored based on predefined parameters and trajectories. This allows for a more systematic and controlled exploration process.

Induced Learning from Existing Data Sources

This approach involves using existing data sources, such as naturalistic driving data, to identify critical scenarios. By analyzing real-world driving data, potential hazards can be identified and used to create test scenarios.

Deductive Learning Using Domain Expertise

The final category of approaches involves using domain expertise to deductively identify critical scenarios. This may involve experts in specific fields, such as human factors or traffic engineering, who can provide insight into potential hazards and risks in different driving situations.

Discussion and Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, it is clear that there is no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to identifying critical scenarios for testing ADS. Instead, a combination of different approaches may be necessary in order to fully capture all potential hazards and risks. Collaboration among stakeholders is also crucial in this field. By sharing knowledge and resources, companies can work together towards enhancing safety and reliability testing practices for ADS. Continuous learning is also important in order to keep up with advancements in technology and new challenges that may arise. As autonomous driving continues to evolve, so too must our methods for testing its safety and reliability. In conclusion, this research paper provides valuable insights into industry practices for challenging autonomous driving systems with critical scenarios. By understanding these practices and challenges, we can work towards improving safety standards for this emerging technology.

Created on 22 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.