Understanding Generalization of Federated Learning: the Trade-off between Model Stability and Optimization

AI-generated keywords: Federated Learning Data Heterogeneity Generalization Performance Optimization Dynamics Algorithmic Stability

AI-generated Key Points

  • Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning approach for training neural networks across multiple devices while protecting local data privacy.
  • Challenges in FL arise from data heterogeneity, leading to inconsistencies in local optima among clients and impacting convergence behavior and generalization performance.
  • Previous studies have focused on convergence analysis and algorithmic stability but have not fully addressed generalization performance, especially concerning neural networks.
  • A new generalization dynamics analysis framework has been introduced in federated optimization to explore the balance between model stability and optimization within FL algorithms.
  • The framework reveals that algorithmic stability and optimization are crucial for the generalization of FL algorithms, with implications for standard federated optimization as well as advanced versions like server momentum.
  • Rapid convergence from large local steps or accelerated momentum can enhance stability and improve generalization performance in FL algorithms.
  • Insights into the trade-offs between model stability and optimization provide valuable guidance for refining future algorithms to achieve superior generalization outcomes in Federated Learning scenarios.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dun Zeng, Zheshun Wu, Shiyu Liu, Yu Pan, Xiaoying Tang, Zenglin Xu

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning approach that trains neural networks across multiple devices while keeping their local data private. However, FL often faces challenges due to data heterogeneity, leading to inconsistent local optima among clients. These inconsistencies can cause unfavorable convergence behavior and generalization performance degradation. Existing studies mainly describe this issue through \textit{convergence analysis}, focusing on how well a model fits training data, or through \textit{algorithmic stability}, which examines the generalization gap. However, neither approach precisely captures the generalization performance of FL algorithms, especially for neural networks. In this paper, we introduce the first generalization dynamics analysis framework in federated optimization, highlighting the trade-offs between model stability and optimization. Through this framework, we show how the generalization of FL algorithms is affected by the interplay of algorithmic stability and optimization. This framework applies to standard federated optimization and its advanced versions, like server momentum. We find that fast convergence from large local steps or accelerated momentum enlarges stability but obtains better generalization performance. Our insights into these trade-offs can guide the practice of future algorithms for better generalization.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Nov. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.16303v1

In the realm of Federated Learning (FL), a distributed learning approach that enables training neural networks across multiple devices while safeguarding the privacy of local data, challenges often arise due to data heterogeneity. This diversity can lead to inconsistencies in local optima among clients, resulting in unfavorable convergence behavior and a decline in generalization performance. Previous studies have primarily focused on analyzing these issues through convergence analysis and algorithmic stability. However, they have not fully captured the generalization performance of FL algorithms, particularly concerning neural networks. To address this gap, a groundbreaking generalization dynamics analysis framework has been introduced in federated optimization. This framework sheds light on the delicate balance between model stability and optimization within FL algorithms. By exploring how algorithmic stability and optimization interact, it becomes evident that the generalization of FL algorithms is intricately linked to these factors. Moreover, this framework is applicable not only to standard federated optimization but also extends to advanced versions such as server momentum. Through comprehensive analysis, it has been discovered that rapid convergence resulting from large local steps or accelerated momentum enhances stability while simultaneously improving generalization performance. These insights into the trade-offs between model stability and optimization offer valuable guidance for refining future algorithms aimed at achieving superior generalization outcomes in Federated Learning scenarios. The study was conducted by a collaborative team comprising Dun Zeng from the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zheshun Wu from Fudan University, Shiyu Liu from Harbin Institute of Technology - Shenzhen, Yu Pan from The Chinese University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen, Xiaoying Tang also from The Chinese University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen, and Zenglin Xu from Fudan University. Their research delves into understanding the intricate dynamics at play in Federated Learning and highlights essential considerations for optimizing generalization performance amidst varying levels of data heterogeneity.
Created on 19 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.