Scenario-Based Field Testing of Drone Missions

AI-generated keywords: Cyber-Physical Systems Field Testing Drone Rescue Missions FiTS Approach Aerospace Industry

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Michael Vierhauser, Kristof Meixner, and Stefan Biffl study testing and validation of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in the aerospace domain.
  • Focus on field testing of drone rescue missions highlights challenges posed by volatile mission environments, especially weather conditions.
  • Lack of structured guidance for executing field tests efficiently despite established methodologies for testing CPSs.
  • Introduce Field Testing Scenario Management (FiTS) approach to provide adaptive field testing guidance.
  • FiTS offers comprehensive support with clear guidelines for data collection to enhance quality assurance practices and enable iterative improvements in field tests and CPSs.
  • Leveraging concepts from scenario-based requirements engineering and Behavior-Driven Development, FiTS defines structured and reusable test scenarios tailored to different roles involved in the testing process.
  • Applied FiTS to three use cases related to a search-and-rescue drone application to validate its effectiveness.
  • Results show that FiTS is feasible and highly beneficial in facilitating drone field testing and subsequent data analysis.
  • Research accepted for publication at the 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), demonstrating its relevance and contribution to advancements in CPS testing within the aerospace industry.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Michael Vierhauser, Kristof Meixner, Stefan Biffl

Accepted for publication at the 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Testing and validating Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in the aerospace domain, such as field testing of drone rescue missions, poses challenges due to volatile mission environments, such as weather conditions. While testing processes and methodologies are well established, structured guidance and execution support for field tests are still weak. This paper identifies requirements for field testing of drone missions, and introduces the Field Testing Scenario Management (FiTS) approach for adaptive field testing guidance. FiTS aims to provide sufficient guidance for field testers as a foundation for efficient data collection to facilitate quality assurance and iterative improvement of field tests and CPSs. FiTS shall leverage concepts from scenario-based requirements engineering and Behavior-Driven Development to define structured and reusable test scenarios, with dedicated tasks and responsibilities for role-specific guidance. We evaluate FiTS by (i) applying it to three use cases for a search-and-rescue drone application to demonstrate feasibility and (ii) interviews with experienced drone developers to assess its usefulness and collect further requirements. The study results indicate FiTS to be feasible and useful to facilitate drone field testing and data analysis

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.08359v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Authors Michael Vierhauser, Kristof Meixner, and Stefan Biffl present a study on the testing and validation of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) in the aerospace domain. The focus of their research is on field testing of drone rescue missions. The authors highlight the challenges posed by volatile mission environments, particularly weather conditions. These factors can significantly impact the effectiveness of testing processes. While established methodologies exist for testing CPSs, there is a lack of structured guidance and support for executing field tests efficiently. In response to this gap, the authors introduce the Field Testing Scenario Management (FiTS) approach as a solution for adaptive field testing guidance. FiTS is designed to offer comprehensive support to field testers by providing clear guidelines for data collection. This guidance aims to enhance quality assurance practices and enable iterative improvements in both field tests and CPSs. Leveraging concepts from scenario-based requirements engineering and Behavior-Driven Development, FiTS defines structured and reusable test scenarios with specific tasks and responsibilities tailored to different roles involved in the testing process. To validate the effectiveness of FiTS, the authors apply it to three use cases related to a search-and-rescue drone application. Through interviews with experienced drone developers, they assess FiTS' utility and gather additional requirements for refinement. The results of their study indicate that FiTS is not only feasible but also highly beneficial in facilitating drone field testing and subsequent data analysis. This research has been accepted for publication at the 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), showcasing its relevance and contribution to advancements in CPS testing within the aerospace industry.
Created on 15 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.