In this empirical study, researchers evaluated the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in grading open text responses to short answer questions in K-12 education. The study focused on assessing different combinations of GPT versions and prompt engineering strategies in marking real student answers across various subject areas (Science and History) and grade levels (ages 5-16). Using a new dataset from Carousel, a quizzing platform, the researchers found that GPT-4 with basic few-shot prompting achieved a high level of performance (Kappa, 0.70), closely approaching human-level grading (0.75). This research builds upon previous findings that GPT-4 can reliably score short answer reading comprehension questions at a level comparable to expert human raters. The results suggest that LLMs could serve as valuable tools for supporting low-stakes formative assessment tasks in K-12 education, offering important implications for enhancing real-world education delivery. Assessment and feedback are critical components of the learning process, with formative assessments playing a key role in improving learning outcomes. However, scaling formative assessment practices has traditionally been challenging due to costs and logistical demands. By demonstrating the potential of LLMs in automating the grading process with high accuracy, this study opens up new possibilities for more efficient and effective educational assessment practices.
- - Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in grading open text responses to short answer questions in K-12 education.
- - The study focused on different combinations of GPT versions and prompt engineering strategies for marking real student answers in Science and History subjects across grade levels 5-16.
- - Using a new dataset from Carousel, researchers found that GPT-4 with basic few-shot prompting achieved high performance (Kappa, 0.70), approaching human-level grading (0.75).
- - Results suggest that LLMs could be valuable tools for supporting low-stakes formative assessment tasks in K-12 education, enhancing real-world education delivery.
- - This research demonstrates the potential of LLMs in automating the grading process with high accuracy, opening up new possibilities for more efficient and effective educational assessment practices.
SummaryResearchers studied how well big computer programs can grade students' written answers in school. They used different versions of a program called GPT and special ways to ask questions for Science and History classes. One version of the program, GPT-4, did really well at grading like a human would. The results show that these programs could help teachers check students' work easily and make learning better. This research shows that using these programs can make grading faster and more accurate in schools.
Definitions- Researchers: People who study things to learn new information.
- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that understand and generate human language.
- Grading: Giving marks or scores to students' work to show how well they did.
- K-12 education: Schooling from kindergarten through 12th grade.
- Assessment: Evaluating or judging someone's knowledge or skills.
Introduction:
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for various natural language processing tasks. These models have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text and understanding complex language patterns. One area where LLMs could potentially be applied is in grading open text responses to short answer questions in K-12 education. This empirical study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in this specific task and explore their potential implications for enhancing real-world education delivery.
Background:
Assessment and feedback are crucial components of the learning process, with formative assessments playing a key role in improving learning outcomes. However, traditional methods of grading such as multiple-choice tests or written exams can be time-consuming and costly for teachers to administer and grade. As a result, scaling formative assessment practices has always been challenging.
The emergence of LLMs offers new possibilities for automating the grading process with high accuracy, potentially reducing costs and logistical demands while providing valuable insights into student performance.
Methodology:
To assess the effectiveness of LLMs in grading open text responses to short answer questions, researchers used a new dataset from Carousel, a quizzing platform that provides students with open-ended prompts across various subject areas (Science and History) and grade levels (ages 5-16). The dataset consisted of real student answers that were graded by both expert human raters and GPT versions using different prompt engineering strategies.
Results:
The results showed that GPT-4 with basic few-shot prompting achieved a high level of performance (Kappa, 0.70), closely approaching human-level grading (0.75). This finding builds upon previous research that demonstrated GPT-4's ability to reliably score short answer reading comprehension questions at a level comparable to expert human raters.
Implications:
The findings from this study have significant implications for enhancing real-world education delivery through more efficient and effective assessment practices. By demonstrating the potential of LLMs in automating the grading process with high accuracy, this research opens up new possibilities for scaling formative assessment practices in K-12 education.
One of the key advantages of using LLMs for grading open text responses is their ability to handle a wide range of language patterns and variations. This makes them suitable for assessing student answers across different subject areas and grade levels, providing teachers with valuable insights into student performance that can inform instructional strategies.
Moreover, the use of LLMs could potentially reduce the time and resources required for grading, allowing teachers to focus on other important aspects of teaching such as lesson planning and personalized instruction. This could also lead to more frequent formative assessments, giving students more opportunities to receive feedback on their learning progress.
Limitations:
While this study demonstrates promising results for using LLMs in grading open text responses, there are some limitations that should be considered. Firstly, the dataset used was limited to only two subject areas (Science and History) and may not represent all subjects taught in K-12 education. Additionally, the study did not explore how different prompt engineering strategies may affect LLM performance.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, this empirical study provides evidence that Large Language Models (LLMs) can effectively grade open text responses to short answer questions in K-12 education. The findings suggest that LLMs could serve as valuable tools for supporting low-stakes formative assessment tasks, offering important implications for enhancing real-world education delivery. Further research is needed to explore how different prompt engineering strategies may impact LLM performance and its applicability across various subject areas in K-12 education.