OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning

AI-generated keywords: OptiGrad

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Vincent Grari and Marcin Detyniecki introduce OptiGrad method for optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets
  • Three primary objectives: maximizing profit margins, ensuring conversion rates, enforcing fairness criteria like demographic parity (DP)
  • Traditional methods rely on linear and semi-definite programming, struggle with balancing profitability and fairness
  • Indirect Ratebook optimization method uses predictor models but faces challenges in continuous rate scenarios
  • Actuaries often use discrete intervals for optimization leading to approximate estimations and suboptimal pricing strategies
  • Proposed method employs direct optimization in continuous rate space with adversarial predictor model for fairness enforcement
  • Method reduces sequential errors, simplifies complexities of traditional models, integrates fairness measures directly into premium calculations
  • Empirical demonstrations show improved margin performance and enhanced enforcement of fairness measures
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Vincent Grari, Marcin Detyniecki

17 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach to optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets through a gradient descent-based method, targeting three key objectives: 1) maximizing profit margins, 2) ensuring conversion rates, and 3) enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP). Traditional pricing optimization, which heavily lean on linear and semi definite programming, encounter challenges in balancing profitability and fairness. These challenges become especially pronounced in situations that necessitate continuous rate adjustments and the incorporation of fairness criteria. Specifically, indirect Ratebook optimization, a widely-used method for new business price setting, relies on predictor models such as XGBoost or GLMs/GAMs to estimate on downstream individually optimized prices. However, this strategy is prone to sequential errors and struggles to effectively manage optimizations for continuous rate scenarios. In practice, to save time actuaries frequently opt for optimization within discrete intervals (e.g., range of [-20\%, +20\%] with fix increments) leading to approximate estimations. Moreover, to circumvent infeasible solutions they often use relaxed constraints leading to suboptimal pricing strategies. The reverse-engineered nature of traditional models complicates the enforcement of fairness and can lead to biased outcomes. Our method addresses these challenges by employing a direct optimization strategy in the continuous space of rates and by embedding fairness through an adversarial predictor model. This innovation not only reduces sequential errors and simplifies the complexities found in traditional models but also directly integrates fairness measures into the commercial premium calculation. We demonstrate improved margin performance and stronger enforcement of fairness highlighting the critical need to evolve existing pricing strategies.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.10275v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning," authors Vincent Grari and Marcin Detyniecki introduce a groundbreaking method for optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets. The approach focuses on three primary objectives: maximizing profit margins, ensuring conversion rates, and enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP). Traditional pricing optimization methods heavily rely on linear and semi-definite programming, which often struggle to strike a balance between profitability and fairness, especially in scenarios requiring continuous rate adjustments and the integration of fairness criteria. The widely-used indirect Ratebook optimization method for setting prices for new business utilizes predictor models like XGBoost or GLMs/GAMs to estimate individually optimized prices downstream. However, this strategy is susceptible to sequential errors and faces challenges in managing optimizations for continuous rate scenarios effectively. Actuaries frequently opt for optimization within discrete intervals (e.g., range of [-20\%, +20%] with fixed increments) to save time, leading to approximate estimations. Additionally, they may relax constraints to avoid infeasible solutions, resulting in suboptimal pricing strategies. The reverse-engineered nature of traditional models further complicates the enforcement of fairness criteria, potentially leading to biased outcomes. To address these challenges, the proposed method employs a direct optimization strategy in the continuous space of rates while embedding fairness through an adversarial predictor model. This innovative approach not only reduces sequential errors and simplifies complexities present in traditional models but also integrates fairness measures directly into commercial premium calculations. Through empirical demonstrations, the authors showcase improved margin performance and enhanced enforcement of fairness measures, underscoring the critical necessity to evolve existing pricing strategies in non-life insurance markets.
Created on 02 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.