On the Efficiency of Convolutional Neural Networks

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • AlexNet revolutionized deep learning in 2012, leading to widespread adoption of convnets in computer vision tasks
  • Researchers face the challenge of balancing accuracy and cost-effectiveness in convnet algorithms
  • Efficiency is a key focus in convnet architecture development to minimize computational requirements without compromising accuracy
  • A simple formula links latency and arithmetic complexity for computational efficiency optimization
  • Conv2d layers with low operational intensity tend to achieve optimal accuracy-complexity trade-offs but require significant memory resources
  • Block-fusion kernels have been developed to improve computational efficiency by creating temporal locality and reducing workspace size
  • The ConvFirst model with block-fusion kernels outperformed the ConvNeXt baseline, running four times faster on ImageNet-1K classification task while maintaining equal accuracy
  • This unified approach marks a new era in model development and kernel optimization, promising greater accuracy at lower computational costs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andrew Lavin

Abstract: Since the breakthrough performance of AlexNet in 2012, convolutional neural networks (convnets) have grown into extremely powerful vision models. Deep learning researchers have used convnets to produce accurate results that were unachievable a decade ago. Yet computer scientists make computational efficiency their primary objective. Accuracy with exorbitant cost is not acceptable; an algorithm must also minimize its computational requirements. Confronted with the daunting computation that convnets use, deep learning researchers also became interested in efficiency. Researchers applied tremendous effort to find the convnet architectures that have the greatest efficiency. However, skepticism grew among researchers and engineers alike about the relevance of arithmetic complexity. Contrary to the prevailing view that latency and arithmetic complexity are irreconcilable, a simple formula relates both through computational efficiency. This insight enabled us to co-optimize the separate factors that determine latency. We observed that the degenerate conv2d layers that produce the best accuracy-complexity trade-off also have low operational intensity. Therefore, kernels that implement these layers use significant memory resources. We solved this optimization problem with block-fusion kernels that implement all layers of a residual block, thereby creating temporal locality, avoiding communication, and reducing workspace size. Our ConvFirst model with block-fusion kernels ran approximately four times as fast as the ConvNeXt baseline with PyTorch Inductor, at equal accuracy on the ImageNet-1K classification task. Our unified approach to convnet efficiency envisions a new era of models and kernels that achieve greater accuracy at lower cost.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.03617v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In 2012, AlexNet revolutionized the field of deep learning with its breakthrough performance, paving the way for widespread adoption of convolutional neural networks (convnets) in computer vision tasks. These convnets have become powerful tools for producing highly accurate results that were previously unattainable. However, as researchers and engineers strive for computational efficiency in their algorithms, they face the challenge of balancing accuracy with cost-effectiveness. Efficiency has become a key focus in the development of convnet architectures as researchers seek to minimize computational requirements without compromising on accuracy. The relevance of arithmetic complexity was initially met with skepticism, but a simple formula has been identified that links latency and arithmetic complexity through computational efficiency. This insight has enabled researchers to optimize factors that determine latency and identify convnet architectures that offer the best accuracy-complexity trade-off. One notable observation is that conv2d layers with low operational intensity tend to achieve optimal accuracy-complexity trade-offs but require significant memory resources. To address this optimization challenge, block-fusion kernels have been developed to efficiently implement all layers of a residual block. By creating temporal locality, avoiding communication overheads, and reducing workspace size, these block-fusion kernels have significantly improved computational efficiency. A recent study by Andrew Lavin introduced the ConvFirst model with block-fusion kernels which outperformed the ConvNeXt baseline using PyTorch Inductor by running approximately four times faster on the ImageNet-1K classification task while maintaining equal accuracy. This unified approach to convnet efficiency marks a new era in model development and kernel optimization, promising greater accuracy at lower computational costs. The findings suggest a promising future for convnets as researchers continue to explore innovative ways to enhance efficiency in deep learning models.
Created on 26 May. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.