Overconfident and Unconfident AI Hinder Human-AI Collaboration

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Transparency Uncertainty Collaboration Trust Calibration

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Transparency is crucial in AI to ensure responsible deployment and effective collaboration between humans and AI systems.
  • Communication of uncertainty, such as providing users with information about AI's confidence level, is essential for transparency.
  • Uncalibrated confidence levels in AI can lead to overestimation or underestimation of correctness likelihood, posing risks to human-AI collaboration.
  • A study by Jingshu Li et al. explores the impact of uncalibrated AI confidence on trust, adoption of advice, and overall collaboration outcomes.
  • Lack of trust calibration support exacerbates issues related to uncalibrated confidence and can lead to misuse or underutilization of AI capabilities.
  • Introducing trust calibration support can help identify instances of uncalibration and reduce misuse tendencies but may also foster distrust among users.
  • Calibrating AI confidence levels is critical for optimizing human-AI collaboration outcomes and future design practices should focus on promoting transparent interactions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jingshu Li, Yitian Yang, Renwen Zhang, Yi-chieh Lee

Abstract: AI transparency is a central pillar of responsible AI deployment and effective human-AI collaboration. A critical approach is communicating uncertainty, such as displaying AI's confidence level, or its correctness likelihood (CL), to users. However, these confidence levels are often uncalibrated, either overestimating or underestimating actual CL, posing risks and harms to human-AI collaboration. This study examines the effects of uncalibrated AI confidence on users' trust in AI, AI advice adoption, and collaboration outcomes. We further examined the impact of increased transparency, achieved through trust calibration support, on these outcomes. Our results reveal that uncalibrated AI confidence leads to both the misuse of overconfident AI and disuse of unconfident AI, thereby hindering outcomes of human-AI collaboration. Deficiency of trust calibration support exacerbates this issue by making it harder to detect uncalibrated confidence, promoting misuse and disuse of AI. Conversely, trust calibration support aids in recognizing uncalibration and reducing misuse, but it also fosters distrust and causes disuse of AI. Our findings highlight the importance of AI confidence calibration for enhancing human-AI collaboration and suggest directions for AI design and regulation.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.07632v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), transparency plays a crucial role in ensuring responsible deployment and fostering effective collaboration between humans and AI systems. One key aspect of transparency is the communication of uncertainty, such as providing users with information about AI's confidence level or correctness likelihood (CL). However, a common challenge arises from the fact that these confidence levels are often uncalibrated, leading to potential overestimation or underestimation of the actual CL. This lack of calibration poses risks and potential harms to human-AI collaboration. A recent study conducted by Jingshu Li, Yitian Yang, Renwen Zhang, and Yi-chieh Lee delves into the impact of uncalibrated AI confidence on various aspects of human-AI interaction. The research specifically focuses on how uncalibrated confidence levels influence users' trust in AI, their adoption of AI advice, and overall collaboration outcomes. Additionally, the study explores how increased transparency through trust calibration support can mitigate these effects. The findings from this investigation shed light on the detrimental consequences of uncalibrated AI confidence. It was discovered that when AI exhibits overconfident behavior, users tend to misuse its recommendations. Conversely, when AI displays low confidence levels, users may disregard its input altogether. These behaviors ultimately hinder the success of human-AI collaboration efforts. Moreover, the study highlights that a deficiency in trust calibration support exacerbates issues related to uncalibrated confidence. Without proper mechanisms in place to detect and address calibration discrepancies, users are more likely to fall into patterns of misusing or underutilizing AI capabilities. On the other hand, introducing trust calibration support can help identify instances of uncalibration and reduce misuse tendencies. However,this enhanced transparency also has its drawbacks - it may inadvertently foster distrust among users and lead to decreased reliance on AI-generated insights. Overall,the findings underscore the critical importance of calibrating AI confidence levels for optimizing human-AI collaboration outcomes. The study suggests valuable directions for future AI design practices and regulatory frameworks aimed at promoting transparent and trustworthy interactions between humans and intelligent systems.
Created on 27 Feb. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.