Image and video forensics have become increasingly important in light of the widespread manipulation of digital media on social media platforms. This has led to the spread of disinformation and fake news. In response to this issue, this survey delves into the realm of image and video identification and forgery detection. It encompasses both manipulated digital media and generative media. The paper is structured into two main sections: Section 3 focuses on image forensics, while Section 4 delves into video forensics. Each section covers detection methods (Sections 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, and 4.2), anti-forensics methods (Sections 3.3 and 4.3), as well as counter anti-forensics methods (Sections 3.4 and 4.4). The organization is visually represented in Figure 2. Additionally, the survey highlights some commonly used datasets in image and video forensics research . These datasets vary in size and contain a mix of real and fake images or videos for analysis. The objectives of this survey include providing an up-to-date review of state-of-the-art research in image and video forensics , examining generative images , analyzing anti-forensic strategies along with countermeasures . Furthermore, a comparison table is presented to showcase the coverage of various techniques across different surveys related to image and video forensics research. This comprehensive overview aims to shed light on the challenges faced in detecting manipulated digital media effectively while also paving the way for promising future directions in this field.
- - Image and video forensics are increasingly important due to widespread manipulation of digital media on social media platforms, leading to the spread of disinformation and fake news.
- - The survey delves into image and video identification, forgery detection, manipulated digital media, and generative media.
- - The paper is structured into two main sections: Section 3 focuses on image forensics, while Section 4 delves into video forensics.
- - Each section covers detection methods (Sections 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, and 4.2), anti-forensics methods (Sections 3.3 and 4.3), as well as counter anti-forensics methods (Sections 3.4 and 4.4).
- - Commonly used datasets in image and video forensics research vary in size and contain a mix of real and fake images or videos for analysis.
- - Objectives of the survey include providing an up-to-date review of state-of-the-art research in image and video forensics, examining generative images, analyzing anti-forensic strategies along with countermeasures.
- - A comparison table is presented to showcase the coverage of various techniques across different surveys related to image and video forensics research.
- - The comprehensive overview aims to shed light on challenges faced in detecting manipulated digital media effectively while paving the way for promising future directions in this field.
Summary1. People are changing pictures and videos online, which can spread lies and fake news.
2. A study looks at finding fake images and videos and how to tell if they are real or not.
3. The study is split into two parts: one about checking pictures and one about checking videos.
4. Each part talks about ways to find fakes, ways people try to hide fakes, and ways to stop them from hiding fakes.
5. Scientists use different sets of real and fake pictures and videos to learn more about spotting fakes.
Definitions- Forensics: The scientific methods used to solve crimes or investigate things
- Manipulation: Changing something in a way that might not be true
- Detection: Finding out if something is there or not
- Anti-forensics: Ways people try to hide evidence from being found
- Counter anti-forensics: Methods used to prevent others from hiding evidence
- Datasets: Collections of information used for research
- Generative: Creating something new or original
In today's digital age, the manipulation of images and videos has become increasingly prevalent. With the rise of social media platforms, it has become easier for individuals to alter and disseminate false information through doctored media. This phenomenon has led to a growing concern over the spread of disinformation and fake news. In response to this issue, researchers have turned their attention towards developing techniques for image and video forensics.
A recent research paper titled "Image and Video Forensics: A Survey" delves into the realm of image and video identification and forgery detection. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art research in this field, covering both manipulated digital media as well as generative media. It is structured into two main sections: Section 3 focuses on image forensics, while Section 4 delves into video forensics.
The first section of the paper (Section 3) covers various methods used for detecting manipulated images (Sections 3.1 and 3.2). These include traditional forensic techniques such as error level analysis, source camera identification, copy-move detection, as well as newer deep learning-based approaches like convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The second section (Section 4) explores similar methods applied specifically to videos.
Apart from detection methods, the survey also discusses anti-forensic strategies employed by perpetrators to evade detection (Sections 3.3 and 4.3). These include techniques such as compression attacks or adding noise to an image or video file before sharing it online. To counter these anti-forensic methods, researchers have also developed countermeasures (Sections 3.4 and 4.4), which are discussed in detail in the paper.
To provide a visual representation of its organization, Figure 2 is included in the paper which showcases how each section is connected to one another.
One important aspect covered in this survey is the use of datasets in image and video forensics research. These datasets vary in size and contain a mix of real and fake images or videos for analysis. Some commonly used datasets mentioned in the paper include CASIA, COVERAGE, and YouTube Face.
The objectives of this survey are to provide an up-to-date review of state-of-the-art research in image and video forensics, examine generative images (images created by AI algorithms), analyze anti-forensic strategies along with countermeasures, and present a comparison table showcasing the coverage of various techniques across different surveys related to image and video forensics research.
In conclusion, "Image and Video Forensics: A Survey" provides a comprehensive overview of current research in this field. It sheds light on the challenges faced in detecting manipulated digital media effectively while also paving the way for promising future directions. With the continuous evolution of technology, it is crucial to stay updated on advancements in image and video forensics to combat the spread of disinformation through doctored media.