Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.03831v1

In this research, a novel AI-based file segment classification method called SIFT (Sifting File Types) is proposed. The study focuses on the issue of type classification of file fragments in digital forensics when the filesystem metadata is missing. The researchers preprocess a popular dataset to separate the file fragments and extract their basic raw features. They then apply the Term Frequency and Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) technique to identify the most decisive features among these raw features. The TF-IDF technique assigns weights to each feature based on its importance, and only selects features with positive weights. These weighted features are used to train and test a classifier that categorizes the file fragments into different file types. The results demonstrate that this approach is effective and achieves better outcomes compared to previous AI-based works. One significant difference between SIFT and other techniques is that SIFT uses a single byte as a separate feature, resulting in 256 total features without any loss of information. Another notable difference is the use of TF-IDF to estimate inter-Classes and intra-Classes information gain of a feature, which sets SIFT apart from other methods. The system overview of SIFT involves preprocessing the files in the dataset, extracting fragments at the byte level, sifting through these fragments to select important features, assigning weights to these features, and using them for classification. The paper provides detailed explanations of each component. The researchers collected 20 file types from a publicly available dataset for evaluation purposes. They extracted 47,482 samples (fragments) from these file types. To ensure unbiased evaluation, they selected an equal number of files from each class (file type). The fragment size chosen for experiments was 512 bytes based on previous research observations. The evaluation metrics for the proposed model include true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), as well as precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The paper provides a detailed explanation of these metrics. The research also discusses the use of 10-fold cross-validation for evaluating the performance of the proposed model. This approach helps in assessing the generalization capability of the classifier. Overall, this study presents a novel AI-based file segment classification method called SIFT, which outperforms other state-of-the-art techniques by at least 8%. The use of lossless feature extraction and TF-IDF for estimating information gain sets SIFT apart from previous works. The results demonstrate that SIFT produces promising outcomes compared to other methods.

• - Novel AI-based file segment classification method called SIFT (Sifting File Types) proposed
• - Focuses on type classification of file fragments in digital forensics when filesystem metadata is missing
• - Preprocesses popular dataset to separate file fragments and extract basic raw features
• - Applies Term Frequency and Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) technique to identify decisive features
• - Uses weighted features to train and test classifier for categorizing file fragments into different types
• - SIFT uses single byte as separate feature, resulting in 256 total features without loss of information
• - Uses TF-IDF to estimate inter-Classes and intra-Classes information gain, setting SIFT apart from other methods
• - System overview involves preprocessing files, extracting fragments at byte level, sifting through fragments for important features, assigning weights, and using them for classification
• - Evaluation conducted on 20 file types with 47,482 samples extracted from these types
• - Fragment size chosen as 512 bytes based on previous research observations
• - Evaluation metrics include TP, FP, FN, precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, AUC-ROC
• - Use of 10-fold cross-validation for evaluating performance and assessing generalization capability of the classifier
• - SIFT outperforms other techniques by at least 8%
• - Lossless feature extraction and TF-IDF estimation sets SIFT apart from previous works

1. Researchers have created a new way to sort different types of files using AI called SIFT. 2. This method helps when important information about the files is missing. 3. They used a special technique to separate the files and find important features. 4. The method uses these features to train a computer program to recognize different types of files. 5. SIFT is better than other methods because it doesn't lose any information and it works really well. Definitions- AI: Artificial Intelligence, which means using computers to do smart things like thinking and learning. - File: A collection of information stored on a computer, like a document or picture. - Classification: Sorting or organizing things into groups based on their similarities or differences. - Features: Special characteristics or qualities that help identify something. - Technique: A special way of doing something.

Introduction: In the field of digital forensics, one of the key challenges faced by investigators is the classification of file fragments when filesystem metadata is missing. This issue can significantly impact investigations as it becomes difficult to determine the type and origin of a file fragment without proper metadata. To address this problem, researchers have proposed various AI-based techniques for classifying file fragments into different types. In this research paper, a novel AI-based method called SIFT (Sifting File Types) is introduced for efficient and accurate file segment classification. Overview of SIFT: The SIFT approach involves preprocessing a popular dataset to extract raw features from file fragments at the byte level. These features are then weighted using Term Frequency and Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) technique to identify the most decisive ones. The weighted features are used to train and test a classifier that categorizes file fragments into different types with high accuracy. Key Differences from Previous Techniques: One significant difference between SIFT and other techniques is its use of a single byte as a separate feature, resulting in 256 total features without any loss of information. This approach allows for more precise classification compared to previous methods that combine multiple bytes into one feature. Another notable difference is the use of TF-IDF to estimate inter-Classes and intra-Classes information gain of a feature. This sets SIFT apart from other methods as it takes into account both global and local importance of each feature in determining its weight. Dataset Collection and Evaluation Metrics: To evaluate the performance of SIFT, researchers collected 20 file types from a publicly available dataset and extracted 47,482 samples (fragments). To ensure unbiased evaluation, an equal number of files were selected from each class (file type). The fragment size chosen for experiments was 512 bytes based on previous research observations. The evaluation metrics used in this study include true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The paper provides a detailed explanation of each metric and its significance in evaluating the performance of the proposed model. Use of 10-fold Cross-validation: To assess the generalization capability of the classifier, researchers used 10-fold cross-validation for evaluating the performance of SIFT. This approach helps in reducing bias and overfitting while providing a more accurate assessment of the model's performance. Results and Conclusion: The results demonstrate that SIFT outperforms other state-of-the-art techniques by at least 8%. The use of lossless feature extraction and TF-IDF for estimating information gain sets SIFT apart from previous works. The high accuracy achieved by SIFT in classifying file fragments into different types makes it a promising method for digital forensics investigations. Conclusion: In conclusion, this research paper presents a novel AI-based file segment classification method called SIFT that addresses the issue of type classification when filesystem metadata is missing. The use of single-byte features and TF-IDF technique for weighting these features sets SIFT apart from other methods. The evaluation results show that SIFT achieves better outcomes compared to previous techniques with high accuracy and minimal false positives or negatives. This study contributes to improving digital forensics investigations by providing an efficient and accurate method for classifying file fragments into different types without relying on filesystem metadata.