PathMMU: A Massive Multimodal Expert-Level Benchmark for Understanding and Reasoning in Pathology

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Large Multimodal Models Pathology PathMMU Benchmark

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The introduction of large multimodal models has revolutionized advancements in pathology.
  • Lack of specialized, high-quality benchmarks has hindered the development and evaluation of these models.
  • PathMMU is a groundbreaking initiative that serves as the largest and most meticulously vetted pathology benchmark.
  • PathMMU comprises 33,573 multimodal multi-choice questions and 21,599 images with detailed explanations for each question.
  • It leverages GPT-4V to generate an extensive set of Questions and Answers (Q&As).
  • A panel of six esteemed pathologists rigorously scrutinizes each question within PathMMU's validation and test sets to establish an expert-level performance benchmark.
  • Empirical evaluations show that even advanced LMMs struggle with the challenges posed by PathMMU.
  • The top-performing LLM, GPT-4V, achieves a modest zero-shot performance rate of 51.7%, lower than human pathologists' 71.4%.
  • Certain open-sourced LMMs surpass GPT-4V after fine-tuning but still fall short compared to human pathologists' expertise.
  • PathMMU aims to provide invaluable insights and catalyze advancements in developing more specialized next-generation Large Multimodal Models for pathology applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuxuan Sun, Hao Wu, Chenglu Zhu, Sunyi Zheng, Qizi Chen, Kai Zhang, Yunlong Zhang, Xiaoxiao Lan, Mengyue Zheng, Jingxiong Li, Xinheng Lyu, Tao Lin, Lin Yang

107 pages, 103 figures
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: The emergence of large multimodal models has unlocked remarkable potential in AI, particularly in pathology. However, the lack of specialized, high-quality benchmark impeded their development and precise evaluation. To address this, we introduce PathMMU, the largest and highest-quality expert-validated pathology benchmark for LMMs. It comprises 33,573 multimodal multi-choice questions and 21,599 images from various sources, and an explanation for the correct answer accompanies each question. The construction of PathMMU capitalizes on the robust capabilities of GPT-4V, utilizing approximately 30,000 gathered image-caption pairs to generate Q\&As. Significantly, to maximize PathMMU's authority, we invite six pathologists to scrutinize each question under strict standards in PathMMU's validation and test sets, while simultaneously setting an expert-level performance benchmark for PathMMU. We conduct extensive evaluations, including zero-shot assessments of 14 open-sourced and three closed-sourced LMMs and their robustness to image corruption. We also fine-tune representative LMMs to assess their adaptability to PathMMU. The empirical findings indicate that advanced LMMs struggle with the challenging PathMMU benchmark, with the top-performing LMM, GPT-4V, achieving only a 51.7\% zero-shot performance, significantly lower than the 71.4\% demonstrated by human pathologists. After fine-tuning, even open-sourced LMMs can surpass GPT-4V with a performance of over 60\%, but still fall short of the expertise shown by pathologists. We hope that the PathMMU will offer valuable insights and foster the development of more specialized, next-generation LLMs for pathology.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.16355v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of Artificial Intelligence, the advent of large multimodal models has revolutionized the potential for advancements in pathology. However, a significant hindrance to their development and accurate evaluation has been the absence of specialized, high-quality benchmarks. To tackle this challenge head-on, a groundbreaking initiative known as PathMMU has been introduced. stands as the largest and most meticulously vetted pathology benchmark tailored specifically for . This comprehensive benchmark comprises an impressive array of 33,573 multimodal multi-choice questions accompanied by 21,599 images sourced from various channels. Notably, each question is complemented by a detailed explanation elucidating the correct answer. The creation of leverages the robust capabilities of GPT-4V, harnessing approximately 30,000 curated image-caption pairs to generate an extensive set of Questions and Answers (Q&As). To ensure the utmost credibility and reliability of , a panel of six esteemed pathologists rigorously scrutinize each question within both its validation and test sets. Simultaneously, these experts establish an expert-level performance benchmark against which can be measured. A series of exhaustive evaluations have been conducted to gauge the efficacy and resilience of 14 open-sourced and three closed-sourced LMMs when faced with the formidable challenges posed by . Additionally, representative LMMs have undergone fine-tuning processes to assess their adaptability to this rigorous benchmark. The empirical findings reveal that even advanced LMMs struggle when confronted with the complexities inherent in the benchmark. The top-performing LLM, GPT-4V, achieves a modest zero-shot performance rate of only 51.7%, significantly lower than the impressive 71.4% demonstrated by human pathologists. Following fine-tuning efforts, certain open-sourced LMMs manage to surpass GPT-4V with performance rates exceeding 60%. However, they still fall short when compared to the expertise exhibited by human pathologists. It is hoped that through its establishment and meticulous curation process, will not only provide invaluable insights but also catalyze advancements in developing more specialized next-generation Large Multimodal Models tailored specifically for applications in pathology.
Created on 05 Mar. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.