PathMMU: A Massive Multimodal Expert-Level Benchmark for Understanding and Reasoning in Pathology
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The introduction of large multimodal models has revolutionized advancements in pathology.
- Lack of specialized, high-quality benchmarks has hindered the development and evaluation of these models.
- PathMMU is a groundbreaking initiative that serves as the largest and most meticulously vetted pathology benchmark.
- PathMMU comprises 33,573 multimodal multi-choice questions and 21,599 images with detailed explanations for each question.
- It leverages GPT-4V to generate an extensive set of Questions and Answers (Q&As).
- A panel of six esteemed pathologists rigorously scrutinizes each question within PathMMU's validation and test sets to establish an expert-level performance benchmark.
- Empirical evaluations show that even advanced LMMs struggle with the challenges posed by PathMMU.
- The top-performing LLM, GPT-4V, achieves a modest zero-shot performance rate of 51.7%, lower than human pathologists' 71.4%.
- Certain open-sourced LMMs surpass GPT-4V after fine-tuning but still fall short compared to human pathologists' expertise.
- PathMMU aims to provide invaluable insights and catalyze advancements in developing more specialized next-generation Large Multimodal Models for pathology applications.
Authors: Yuxuan Sun, Hao Wu, Chenglu Zhu, Sunyi Zheng, Qizi Chen, Kai Zhang, Yunlong Zhang, Xiaoxiao Lan, Mengyue Zheng, Jingxiong Li, Xinheng Lyu, Tao Lin, Lin Yang
Abstract: The emergence of large multimodal models has unlocked remarkable potential in AI, particularly in pathology. However, the lack of specialized, high-quality benchmark impeded their development and precise evaluation. To address this, we introduce PathMMU, the largest and highest-quality expert-validated pathology benchmark for LMMs. It comprises 33,573 multimodal multi-choice questions and 21,599 images from various sources, and an explanation for the correct answer accompanies each question. The construction of PathMMU capitalizes on the robust capabilities of GPT-4V, utilizing approximately 30,000 gathered image-caption pairs to generate Q\&As. Significantly, to maximize PathMMU's authority, we invite six pathologists to scrutinize each question under strict standards in PathMMU's validation and test sets, while simultaneously setting an expert-level performance benchmark for PathMMU. We conduct extensive evaluations, including zero-shot assessments of 14 open-sourced and three closed-sourced LMMs and their robustness to image corruption. We also fine-tune representative LMMs to assess their adaptability to PathMMU. The empirical findings indicate that advanced LMMs struggle with the challenging PathMMU benchmark, with the top-performing LMM, GPT-4V, achieving only a 51.7\% zero-shot performance, significantly lower than the 71.4\% demonstrated by human pathologists. After fine-tuning, even open-sourced LMMs can surpass GPT-4V with a performance of over 60\%, but still fall short of the expertise shown by pathologists. We hope that the PathMMU will offer valuable insights and foster the development of more specialized, next-generation LLMs for pathology.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.