MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: MLLM Evaluation Benchmark Multimodal Perception

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) has impressive performance in multimodal tasks
  • Previous case studies have not provided a comprehensive evaluation of MLLM's capabilities
  • The authors introduce the first MLLM Evaluation benchmark called MME
  • MME assesses perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks
  • Instruction-answer pairs are manually designed to avoid data leakage from public datasets
  • Concise instruction design enables fair comparisons between different MLLMs without relying heavily on prompt engineering
  • Quantitative statistics can be easily obtained using these instructions
  • 12 advanced MLLMs were evaluated on the MME benchmark
  • Areas for improvement in existing models were highlighted
  • Potential directions for future model optimization were suggested
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Chaoyou Fu, Peixian Chen, Yunhang Shen, Yulei Qin, Mengdan Zhang, Xu Lin, Zhenyu Qiu, Wei Lin, Jinrui Yang, Xiawu Zheng, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Rongrong Ji

Project page: https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models

Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks, showing amazing emergent abilities in recent studies, such as writing poems based on an image. However, it is difficult for these case studies to fully reflect the performance of MLLM, lacking a comprehensive evaluation. In this paper, we fill in this blank, presenting the first MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks. In order to avoid data leakage that may arise from direct use of public datasets for evaluation, the annotations of instruction-answer pairs are all manually designed. The concise instruction design allows us to fairly compare MLLMs, instead of struggling in prompt engineering. Besides, with such an instruction, we can also easily carry out quantitative statistics. A total of 12 advanced MLLMs are comprehensively evaluated on our MME, which not only suggests that existing MLLMs still have a large room for improvement, but also reveals the potential directions for the subsequent model optimization.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.13394v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) has gained attention for its impressive performance in multimodal tasks, such as generating poems based on images. However, previous case studies have not provided a comprehensive evaluation of MLLM's capabilities. In this paper, the authors address this gap by introducing the first MLLM Evaluation benchmark called MME. This benchmark assesses both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. To ensure unbiased evaluation, the instruction-answer pairs are manually designed to avoid data leakage from public datasets. The concise instruction design enables fair comparisons between different MLLMs without relying heavily on prompt engineering. Additionally, the authors demonstrate that quantitative statistics can be easily obtained using these instructions. The study evaluates 12 advanced MLLMs on the MME benchmark and highlights areas for improvement in existing models while suggesting potential directions for future model optimization. Overall, this research provides a valuable contribution to evaluating and advancing multimodal large language models.
Created on 07 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.