3DMASC: Accessible, explainable 3D point clouds classification. Application to Bi-spectral Topo-bathymetric lidar data

AI-generated keywords: Earth observation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Three-dimensional (3D) data is increasingly prevalent in earth observation
  • Lack of accessible and explainable automatic classification methods for 3D surveys, especially for emerging technologies like topo-bathymetric lidar data
  • Introduction of the 3DMASC workflow for explainable machine learning in 3D data classification
  • Utilization of dual-cloud features, multi-scale descriptors, and new descriptors based on spatial variations in the 3DMASC workflow
  • Application of 3DMASC to multi-class classification of topo-bathymetric lidar data in coastal and fluvial environments
  • Development of optimized predictor sets with reduced complexity using multivariate and embedded feature selection techniques
  • Identification of key features relevant for describing coastal and riverine scenes, including dual-cloud features, lidar return-based attributes averaged over specific scales, and statistics derived from dimensionality-based and spectral features
  • Effective building of classifiers with small to medium spherical neighborhood diameters combined with distance-to-ground or distance-to-water-surface features
  • Achievement of high classification accuracies ranging from 91% to 98% using models trained on fewer than 2000 samples per class without relying on optional RGB information
  • Outperformance of existing approaches by the descriptive power of 3DMASC features in comparison to traditional point cloud classification methods
  • Accessibility of contributions through a plugin in CloudCompare software for non-specialist users to create classifiers for various types of 3D data characterized by one or two point clouds such as airborne or terrestrial lidar
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Mathilde Letard (GR), Dimitri Lague (GR), Arthur Le Guennec (GR), Sébastien Lefèvre (OBELIX), Baptiste Feldmann (GR), Paul Leroy (GR), Daniel Girardeau-Montaut (LETG - Rennes), Thomas Corpetti (LETG - Rennes)

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2024, 207, pp.175-197

Abstract: Three-dimensional data have become increasingly present in earth observation over the last decades. However, many 3D surveys are still underexploited due to the lack of accessible and explainable automatic classification methods, for example, new topo-bathymetric lidar data. In this work, we introduce explainable machine learning for 3D data classification using Multiple Attributes, Scales, and Clouds under 3DMASC, a new workflow. This workflow introduces multi-cloud classification through dual-cloud features, encrypting local spectral and geometrical ratios and differences. 3DMASC uses classical multi-scale descriptors adapted to all types of 3D point clouds and new ones based on their spatial variations. In this paper, we present the performances of 3DMASC for multi-class classification of topo-bathymetric lidar data in coastal and fluvial environments. We show how multivariate and embedded feature selection allows the building of optimized predictor sets of reduced complexity, and we identify features particularly relevant for coastal and riverine scene descriptions. Our results show the importance of dual-cloud features, lidar return-based attributes averaged over specific scales, and of statistics of dimensionality-based and spectral features. Additionally, they indicate that small to medium spherical neighbourhood diameters (<7 m) are sufficient to build effective classifiers, namely when combined with distance-to-ground or distance-to-water-surface features. Without using optional RGB information, and with a maximum of 37 descriptors, we obtain classification accuracies between 91 % for complex multi-class tasks and 98 % for lower-level processing using models trained on less than 2000 samples per class. Comparisons with classical point cloud classification methods show that 3DMASC features have a significantly improved descriptive power. Our contributions are made available through a plugin in the CloudCompare software, allowing non-specialist users to create classifiers for any type of 3D data characterized by 1 or 2 point clouds (airborne or terrestrial lidar, structure from motion), and two labelled topo-bathymetric lidar datasets, available on https://opentopography.org/.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.09481v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the field of earth observation, three-dimensional (3D) data has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Despite this growth, many 3D surveys remain underutilized due to the lack of accessible and explainable automatic classification methods, particularly for emerging technologies like topo-bathymetric lidar data. To address this gap, a new workflow called 3DMASC (Multiple Attributes, Scales, and Clouds) has been introduced for explainable machine learning in 3D data classification. The 3DMASC workflow incorporates multi-cloud classification by utilizing dual-cloud features that encrypt local spectral and geometrical ratios and differences. It leverages classical multi-scale descriptors that are adaptable to various types of 3D point clouds, along with new descriptors based on spatial variations. This approach has been applied to the multi-class classification of topo-bathymetric lidar data in coastal and fluvial environments. Through the use of multivariate and embedded feature selection techniques, optimized predictor sets with reduced complexity have been developed using 3DMASC. The study identifies key features that are particularly relevant for describing coastal and riverine scenes, highlighting the significance of dual-cloud features, lidar return-based attributes averaged over specific scales, as well as statistics derived from dimensionality-based and spectral features. The results demonstrate that small to medium spherical neighborhood diameters (<7 m) can effectively build classifiers when combined with distance-to-ground or distance-to-water-surface features. Notably, without relying on optional RGB information and utilizing a maximum of 37 descriptors, classification accuracies ranging from 91% for complex multi-class tasks to 98% for lower-level processing have been achieved using models trained on fewer than 2000 samples per class. Comparisons with traditional point cloud classification methods reveal that the descriptive power of 3DMASC features significantly outperforms existing approaches. Furthermore, the contributions of this work are made accessible through a plugin in the CloudCompare software, enabling non-specialist users to create classifiers for various types of 3D data characterized by one or two point clouds (such as airborne or terrestrial lidar). Additionally, two labeled topo-bathymetric lidar datasets are available for further exploration on https://opentopography.org/.
Created on 02 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.