The use of deep learning enables high diagnostic accuracy in detecting syndesmotic instability on weight-bearing CT scanning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Deep learning techniques have shown promising results in detecting syndesmotic instability on weight-bearing CT scans
- Syndesmosis instability can lead to significant morbidity and accelerated arthritic changes if left undiagnosed
- Traditional diagnostic methods for syndesmotic instability are reliable but time-consuming and experience-dependent
- The study aimed to improve accuracy, reduce analysis time, and minimize inter-observer bias by automating 3D volume assessment of syndesmosis anatomy using WBCT scans
- Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool in medical imaging analysis with potential applications in detecting complex conditions like syndesmotic instability
- Specialized WBCT scans provide valuable information about ankle joint stability under weight-bearing conditions and are crucial for accurate diagnosis of syndesmosis instability
- By leveraging deep learning algorithms, the study aimed to automate the diagnosis process for syndesmotic instability and reduce reliance on manual interpretation
- The research findings have important implications for clinical practice, emphasizing the benefits of incorporating deep learning techniques into routine diagnostic procedures for identifying syndesmotic instability
Authors: Alireza Borjali, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Rohan Bhimani, Daniel Guss, Orhun K. Muratoglu, Christopher W. DiGiovanni, Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan, Bart Lubberts
Abstract: Delayed diagnosis of syndesmosis instability can lead to significant morbidity and accelerated arthritic change in the ankle joint. Weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) has shown promising potential for early and reliable detection of isolated syndesmotic instability using 3D volumetric measurements. While these measurements have been reported to be highly accurate, they are also experience-dependent, time-consuming, and need a particular 3D measurement software tool that leads the clinicians to still show more interest in the conventional diagnostic methods for syndesmotic instability. The purpose of this study was to increase accuracy, accelerate analysis time, and reduce inter-observer bias by automating 3D volume assessment of syndesmosis anatomy using WBCT scans. We conducted a retrospective study using previously collected WBCT scans of patients with unilateral syndesmotic instability. 144 bilateral ankle WBCT scans were evaluated (48 unstable, 96 control). We developed three deep learning (DL) models for analyzing WBCT scans to recognize syndesmosis instability. These three models included two state-of-the-art models (Model 1 - 3D convolutional neural network [CNN], and Model 2 - CNN with long short-term memory [LSTM]), and a new model (Model 3 - differential CNN LSTM) that we introduced in this study. Model 1 failed to analyze the WBCT scans (F1-score = 0). Model 2 only misclassified two cases (F1-score = 0.80). Model 3 outperformed Model 2 and achieved a nearly perfect performance, misclassifying only one case (F1-score = 0.91) in the control group as unstable while being faster than Model 2.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.