LLM A*: Human in the Loop Large Language Models Enabled A* Search for Robotics

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Path Planning Human Feedback Transparency Accessibility

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Hengjia Xiao and Peng Wang explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in path planning for mobile embodied agents such as robots.
  • The study introduces a novel framework called LLM A*, which combines LLMs with the A* algorithm for efficient and near-optimal path planning with minimal data input.
  • Prompts are used to provide essential information to LLMs and enable human feedback on intermediate planning outcomes, making LLM A* transparent and understandable to humans.
  • LLM A* enables code-free path planning, promoting accessibility and inclusivity in AI applications, particularly benefiting communities with limited coding proficiency.
  • Comparative analysis shows that LLM A* is more efficient in search space utilization compared to traditional methods like A* and Reinforcement Learning (RL), while achieving comparable path outcomes to A* and surpassing RL performance.
  • The interactive nature of LLM A* makes it a promising tool for collaborative human-robot tasks, enhancing its practical applicability.
  • This research provides insights into leveraging LLMs for enhanced path planning and highlights the potential of integrating human feedback within AI systems for improved decision-making processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hengjia Xiao, Peng Wang

7 figures, 8 pages

Abstract: This research focuses on how Large Language Models (LLMs) can help with (path) planning for mobile embodied agents such as robots, in a human-in-the-loop and interactive manner. A novel framework named LLM A*, aims to leverage the commonsense of LLMs, and the utility-optimal A* is proposed to facilitate few-shot near-optimal path planning. Prompts are used for two main purposes: 1) to provide LLMs with essential information like environments, costs, heuristics, etc.; 2) to communicate human feedback on intermediate planning results to LLMs. This approach takes human feedback on board and renders the entire planning process transparent (akin to a `white box') to humans. Moreover, it facilitates code-free path planning, thereby fostering the accessibility and inclusiveness of artificial intelligence techniques to communities less proficient in coding. Comparative analysis against A* and RL demonstrates that LLM A* exhibits greater efficiency in terms of search space and achieves paths comparable to A* while outperforming RL. The interactive nature of LLM A* also makes it a promising tool for deployment in collaborative human-robot tasks. Codes and Supplemental Materials can be found at GitHub: https://github.com/speedhawk/LLM-A-.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.01797v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their research titled "LLM A*: Human in the Loop Large Language Models Enabled A* Search for Robotics," authors Hengjia Xiao and Peng Wang explore the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in path planning for mobile embodied agents such as robots. The study introduces a novel framework called LLM A*, which combines the commonsense capabilities of LLMs with the utility-optimal A* algorithm to facilitate efficient and near-optimal path planning with minimal data input. Central to this approach is the use of prompts, which serve two purposes: providing essential information to LLMs and enabling human feedback on intermediate planning outcomes. This emphasis on transparency throughout the planning process makes LLM A* akin to a 'white box' system that allows humans to understand and engage with the decision-making mechanisms employed by LLMs. Additionally, by enabling code-free path planning, this approach promotes accessibility and inclusivity in artificial intelligence applications, particularly benefiting communities with limited coding proficiency. Comparative analysis against traditional methods like A* and Reinforcement Learning (RL) showcases the efficiency of LLM A* in terms of search space utilization while achieving comparable path outcomes to A* and surpassing RL performance. The interactive nature of LLM A* also positions it as a promising tool for collaborative human-robot tasks, further enhancing its practical applicability. Overall, this research not only provides valuable insights into leveraging LLMs for enhanced path planning but also highlights the potential for integrating human feedback within AI systems for improved decision-making processes. For those interested in exploring further, codes and supplemental materials related to LLM A* can be accessed on GitHub at https://github.com/speedhawk/LLM-A-.
Created on 12 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.