Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Eureka Large Language Models Reinforcement Learning Human Feedback Curriculum Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with complex low-level manipulation tasks
  • Eureka is a human-level reward design algorithm powered by LLMs
  • Eureka performs evolutionary optimization over reward code using state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4
  • Eureka generates rewards for acquiring complex skills through reinforcement learning without task-specific prompting or predefined templates
  • Eureka surpasses human experts on 83% of tasks and achieves an average normalized improvement of 52%
  • Eureka enables gradient-free in-context learning approach to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF)
  • Eureka incorporates human inputs to enhance the quality and safety of generated rewards without model updating
  • Eureka rewards applied in a curriculum learning setting enable a simulated Shadow Hand to perform pen spinning tricks with rapid speed and precision
  • Eureka's human-level reward design algorithm leverages LLMs for complex low-level manipulation tasks
  • The results demonstrate the superiority of Eureka over expert human-engineered rewards and its potential for improving reinforcement learning with human feedback.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yecheng Jason Ma, William Liang, Guanzhi Wang, De-An Huang, Osbert Bastani, Dinesh Jayaraman, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, Anima Anandkumar

Project website and open-source code: https://eureka-research.github.io/

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled as high-level semantic planners for sequential decision-making tasks. However, harnessing them to learn complex low-level manipulation tasks, such as dexterous pen spinning, remains an open problem. We bridge this fundamental gap and present Eureka, a human-level reward design algorithm powered by LLMs. Eureka exploits the remarkable zero-shot generation, code-writing, and in-context improvement capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-4, to perform evolutionary optimization over reward code. The resulting rewards can then be used to acquire complex skills via reinforcement learning. Without any task-specific prompting or pre-defined reward templates, Eureka generates reward functions that outperform expert human-engineered rewards. In a diverse suite of 29 open-source RL environments that include 10 distinct robot morphologies, Eureka outperforms human experts on 83% of the tasks, leading to an average normalized improvement of 52%. The generality of Eureka also enables a new gradient-free in-context learning approach to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), readily incorporating human inputs to improve the quality and the safety of the generated rewards without model updating. Finally, using Eureka rewards in a curriculum learning setting, we demonstrate for the first time, a simulated Shadow Hand capable of performing pen spinning tricks, adeptly manipulating a pen in circles at rapid speed.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.12931v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models," Yecheng Jason Ma, William Liang, Guanzhi Wang, De-An Huang, Osbert Bastani, Dinesh Jayaraman, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan and Anima Anandkumar discuss the challenges of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for complex low-level manipulation tasks. While LLMs have been successful in high-level semantic planning for sequential decision-making tasks, they struggle with tasks such as dexterous pen spinning. To address this gap, the authors introduce Eureka - a human-level reward design algorithm powered by LLMs. Eureka leverages the capabilities of state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 to perform evolutionary optimization over reward code. It exploits zero-shot generation, code writing and in-context improvement abilities to generate rewards that can be used for acquiring complex skills through reinforcement learning without any task specific prompting or pre defined templates. To evaluate Eureka's performance, the authors conducted experiments in 29 open source RL environments with 10 different robot morphologies. They found that Eureka surpasses human experts on 83% of the tasks and achieves an average normalized improvement of 52%. This highlights the generality and effectiveness of Eureka in various scenarios. Additionally, Eureka enables a gradient free in context learning approach to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). It incorporates human inputs to enhance the quality and safety of generated rewards without requiring model updating. Finally, the authors demonstrate the practical application of Eureka rewards in a curriculum learning setting by showcasing a simulated Shadow Hand capable of performing pen spinning tricks with rapid speed and precision. Overall this research presents an innovative solution to leveraging LLMs for complex low level manipulation tasks through Eureka's human level reward design algorithm. The results demonstrate its superiority over expert human engineered rewards and its potential for improving reinforcement learning with human feedback.
Created on 28 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.