Do Agile Scaling Approaches Make A Difference? An Empirical Comparison of Team Effectiveness Across Popular Scaling Approaches

AI-generated keywords: Scaling Strategy Agile Methodologies Team Effectiveness Stakeholder Satisfaction Management Approach

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Organizations are seeking strategies to effectively scale development across teams in the era of Agile methodologies
  • Various scaling strategies have emerged, such as "SAFe" and "LeSS", with some organizations developing their own methods
  • A study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Agile teams using different scaling methods
  • The study focused on factors like responsiveness, stakeholder satisfaction, and management approach
  • 15,078 Agile team members and 1,841 stakeholders were surveyed for insights and experiences
  • Statistical analyses were performed on the collected data
  • Minor differences in effectiveness were found across the evaluated scaling strategies
  • Organizations should select a scaling strategy based on their unique culture and management style rather than expecting one method to guarantee superior team effectiveness
  • Considering factors like culture and management style can optimize Agile practices and enhance overall performance.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christiaan Verwijs, Daniel Russo

Abstract: In the era of Agile methodologies, organizations are exploring strategies to scale development across teams. Various scaling strategies have emerged, from "SAFe" to "LeSS", with some organizations creating their own methods. Despite numerous studies on organizational challenges with these approaches, none have empirically compared their impact on Agile team effectiveness. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Agile teams using different scaling methods, focusing on factors like responsiveness, stakeholder satisfaction, and management approach. We surveyed 15,078 Agile team members and 1,841 stakeholders, followed by statistical analyses. The results showed minor differences in effectiveness across scaling strategies. In essence, the choice of scaling strategy does not significantly impact team effectiveness, and organizations should select based on their culture and management style.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.06599v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the era of Agile methodologies, organizations are constantly seeking strategies to effectively scale development across teams. This has led to the emergence of various scaling strategies, such as "SAFe" and "LeSS", with some organizations even developing their own methods. To address the gap in knowledge regarding their impact on Agile team effectiveness, a study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Agile teams using different scaling methods. The study focused on factors like responsiveness, stakeholder satisfaction, and management approach. A total of 15,078 Agile team members and 1,841 stakeholders were surveyed for their insights and experiences. The data collected was then subjected to statistical analyses. The results revealed only minor differences in effectiveness across the various scaling strategies that were evaluated; thus indicating that organizations should select a scaling strategy based on their unique culture and management style rather than expecting one particular method to guarantee superior team effectiveness. By considering factors like culture and management style when choosing a scaling strategy, organizations can optimize their Agile practices and enhance overall performance.
Created on 12 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.