This study utilizes a mixed-methods approach to analyze the funding acknowledgments in 2.3 million scientific publications published between 2008 and 2021 by authors affiliated with research institutions in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries. The primary objective is to identify the major funders and their contributions to national scientific publications, as well as gain a better understanding of the funding mechanism in relation to collaboration and publication. The researchers examined publication data from the Web of Science (WoS) database to provide key insights into funding activities. They found that Saudi Arabia and Qatar lead the region in terms of both the number of publications acknowledging funding sources and the level of international collaborations. This is largely due to strong linkages with foreign agencies. However, there are differences between domestic and international publications when it comes to funding structures. For example, Turkey and Iran are dominated by one or two major funders, while Saudi Arabia has multiple funders. Additionally, Iran and Kuwait primarily rely on domestic agencies for research funding. The study highlights that scientific research in MENA countries is mainly funded by the government and academic sectors, with little involvement from the industry sector. The qualitative analyses conducted provide further context into the complex funding mechanism. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the funding structure in MENA countries and offer insights for funders and research managers to evaluate the funding landscape. It also emphasizes the importance of both quantitative and qualitative methods in uncovering information not explicitly communicated in funding acknowledgments. While this study provides valuable insights, it acknowledges certain limitations such as achieving complete standardization of funding acknowledgments may not be feasible which necessitates ongoing reliance on qualitative analyses. Nonetheless, these quantitative and qualitative analyses are expected to inform policymakers on the funding structure of national science systems in MENA countries and guide future funding strategies. It should be noted that this research project received no external financial support but utilized data made available by Clarivate Analytics -the provider of Web of Science-and InCites; where author is an employee at Clarivate Analytics . Overall, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the funding landscape in MENA countries and provides valuable insights for stakeholders involved in research financing management decisions making process .
- - Study analyzes funding acknowledgments in 2.3 million scientific publications from 2008 to 2021 in MENA countries
- - Objective is to identify major funders and understand funding mechanism in relation to collaboration and publication
- - Saudi Arabia and Qatar lead region in number of publications acknowledging funding sources and level of international collaborations
- - Differences between domestic and international publications in funding structures (e.g., Turkey and Iran dominated by one or two major funders, Saudi Arabia has multiple funders)
- - Iran and Kuwait primarily rely on domestic agencies for research funding
- - Scientific research in MENA countries mainly funded by government and academic sectors, little involvement from industry sector
- - Qualitative analyses provide further context into complex funding mechanism
- - Findings contribute to understanding of funding structure in MENA countries, offer insights for funders and research managers
- - Importance of quantitative and qualitative methods in uncovering information not explicitly communicated in funding acknowledgments
- - Limitations include difficulty achieving complete standardization of funding acknowledgments, reliance on qualitative analyses ongoing
- - Expected to inform policymakers on funding structure of national science systems, guide future funding strategies
A study looked at how scientific research in countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is funded. They analyzed 2.3 million publications from 2008 to 2021. The goal was to find out who gives money for research and how it affects collaboration and publication. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have the most publications that mention funding, and they also collaborate with researchers from other countries a lot. Some countries, like Turkey and Iran, rely on just one or two major funders, while Saudi Arabia has many different funders. Iran and Kuwait mostly get their research money from agencies within their own country. Most of the funding for scientific research in MENA countries comes from the government and universities, not companies. The study used both numbers and descriptions to understand how funding works in these countries. This information can help people who give money for research make better decisions about where to put their money."
Definitions- Scientific: having to do with science or studying things using experiments
- Publications: books, articles, or papers that are written by researchers and shared with others
- Funding: money that is given to support something
- Acknowledgments: saying thank you or giving credit to someone for helping you
- Mechanism: a way that something works or happens
- Collaboration: working together with other people on a project or task
- Dominate: being the most important or powerful
- Agencies: organizations that do specific work
- Qualitative analyses: looking closely
Uncovering the Funding Landscape in Middle Eastern and North African Countries
The scientific research landscape in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries is rapidly changing. In order to gain a better understanding of the funding mechanism in relation to collaboration and publication, researchers have conducted a mixed-methods study analyzing the funding acknowledgments in 2.3 million scientific publications published between 2008 and 2021 by authors affiliated with research institutions in MENA countries. This article provides an overview of their findings, as well as insights for funders and research managers on how to evaluate the funding landscape.
Quantitative Analyses
The researchers examined publication data from the Web of Science (WoS) database to provide key insights into funding activities. They found that Saudi Arabia and Qatar lead the region in terms of both the number of publications acknowledging funding sources and the level of international collaborations. This is largely due to strong linkages with foreign agencies. However, there are differences between domestic and international publications when it comes to funding structures: Turkey and Iran are dominated by one or two major funders, while Saudi Arabia has multiple funders; Iran and Kuwait primarily rely on domestic agencies for research funding; overall, scientific research in MENA countries is mainly funded by government or academic sectors with little involvement from industry sector.
Qualitative Analyses
In addition to quantitative analyses, qualitative analyses were also conducted which provided further context into the complex funding mechanism. The findings contribute to a better understanding of how different stakeholders involved in research financing management decisions make use of available resources within each country’s science system.
Limitations & Future Directions
This study acknowledges certain limitations such as achieving complete standardization of funding acknowledgments may not be feasible which necessitates ongoing reliance on qualitative analyses. Nonetheless, these quantitative and qualitative analyses are expected to inform policymakers on the current state of national science systems in MENA countries as well as guide future strategies for resource allocation decisions making process . It should be noted that this research project received no external financial support but utilized data made available by Clarivate Analytics -the provider of Web of Science-and InCites; where author is an employee at Clarivate Analytics .
Conclusion
Overall, this study contributes greatly towards uncovering information about national science systems within MENA countries that was not explicitly communicated through traditional methods such as grant applications or reports alone – highlighting just how important both quantitative & qualitative methods can be when it comes gaining insight into complex topics like this one! By providing valuable insights for stakeholders involved in resource allocation decisions making process , this study emphasizes just how essential it is for funders & researchers alike understand more about regional trends & patterns when it comes allocating resources efficiently & effectively across different regions around world – especially those who may lack access other forms support/funding outside their own country’s borders!