Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases

AI-generated keywords: Scientific Growth Bibliographic Databases Economic Development Physical and Technical Sciences Life Sciences

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on growth of science in the field of science studies
  • Researchers used Dimensions, Microsoft Academic, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for analysis
  • Overall growth rate of science is 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years
  • Model with five segments fits publication data best, indicating different growth rates related to economic and political developments
  • Examined scientific growth in Physical and Technical Sciences, as well as Life Sciences
  • Slight differences in growth rates between these fields
  • Scientific growth in the UK was higher than economic growth
  • Various methods used to collect publication data for each database (Scopus, Microsoft Academic)
  • Insights into how economic and political developments influence scientific progress over time
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Ruediger Mutz

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Growth of science is a prevalent issue in science of science studies. In recent years, two new bibliographic databases have been introduced which can be used to study growth processes in science from centuries back: Dimensions from Digital Science and Microsoft Academic. In this study, we used publication data from these new databases and added publication data from two established databases (Web of Science from Clarivate Analytics and Scopus from Elsevier) to investigate scientific growth processes from the beginning of the modern science system until today. We estimated regression models that included simultaneously the publication counts from the four databases. The results of the unrestricted growth of science calculations show that the overall growth rate amounts to 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years. As the comparison of various segmented regression models in the current study revealed, the model with five segments fits the publication data best. We demonstrated that these segments with different growth rates can be interpreted very well, since they are related to either phases of economic (e.g., industrialization) and / or political developments (e.g., Second World War). In this study, we additionally analyzed scientific growth in two broad fields (Physical and Technical Sciences as well as Life Sciences) and the relationship of scientific and economic growth in UK. The comparison between the two fields revealed only slight differences. The comparison of the British economic and scientific growth rates showed that the economic growth rate is slightly lower than the scientific growth rate.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2012.07675v3

This study focuses on the growth of science in the field of science studies. The researchers utilized two new bibliographic databases, Dimensions from Digital Science and Microsoft Academic, along with two established databases, Web of Science from Clarivate Analytics and Scopus from Elsevier, to analyze scientific growth processes from the beginning of the modern science system until today. By estimating regression models that included publication counts from all four databases, the researchers found that the overall growth rate of science amounts to 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years. They also discovered that a model with five segments fits the publication data best, indicating different growth rates related to economic and political developments such as industrialization and the Second World War. Furthermore, this study examined scientific growth in two broad fields: Physical and Technical Sciences, as well as Life Sciences. The comparison between these fields revealed only slight differences in their growth rates. Additionally, the researchers analyzed the relationship between scientific and economic growth in the UK and found that while both rates were high, economic growth was slightly lower than scientific growth. To conduct their analysis, the researchers collected publication data using various methods for each database. For Scopus they used its advanced search function to download indexed papers per year without any restrictions on document types; broad subject categories were defined based on Scopus subject areas. Microsoft Academic was accessed through its search interface and bulk data access via Azure platform; a snapshot containing bibliographic information for over 212 million publications dating back to 1800 was downloaded. This study provides valuable insights into how different factors such as economic and political developments can influence scientific progress by examining scientific growth processes over time using multiple databases.
Created on 15 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.