Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements and are widely used across various domains.
  • There is a concern that LLMs can be misused to generate harmful or malicious content.
  • Efforts have been made to align LLMs with human values and prevent them from producing inappropriate content.
  • Alignment-breaking attacks involve using optimized or handcrafted prompts to bypass alignment mechanisms in LLMs.
  • The authors propose a solution called Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) that incorporates a robust alignment checking function without requiring retraining or fine-tuning processes.
  • RA-LLM successfully defends against both adversarial prompts and handcrafted jailbreaking prompts, reducing their attack success rates significantly.
  • This research provides a practical defense mechanism against alignment-breaking attacks and addresses concerns surrounding the misuse of LLMs.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bochuan Cao, Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen

16 Pages, 5 Figures, 3 Tables

Abstract: Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements and are now widely used across various domains. Unfortunately, there has been a rising concern that LLMs can be misused to generate harmful or malicious content. Though a line of research has focused on aligning LLMs with human values and preventing them from producing inappropriate content, such alignments are usually vulnerable and can be bypassed by alignment-breaking attacks via adversarially optimized or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts. In this work, we introduce a Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM) to defend against potential alignment-breaking attacks. RA-LLM can be directly constructed upon an existing aligned LLM with a robust alignment checking function, without requiring any expensive retraining or fine-tuning process of the original LLM. Furthermore, we also provide a theoretical analysis for RA-LLM to verify its effectiveness in defending against alignment-breaking attacks. Through real-world experiments on open-source large language models, we demonstrate that RA-LLM can successfully defend against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular handcrafted jailbreaking prompts by reducing their attack success rates from nearly 100\% to around 10\% or less.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.14348v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements and are now widely used across various domains. However, there is a growing concern that LLMs can be misused to generate harmful or malicious content. To address this issue, efforts have been made to align LLMs with human values and prevent them from producing inappropriate content. Unfortunately, these alignments are often vulnerable to alignment-breaking attacks. Such attacks involve the use of adversarially optimized or handcrafted jailbreaking prompts to bypass the alignment mechanisms in LLMs. To counter this problem, the authors propose a solution called Robustly Aligned LLM (RA-LLM). RA-LLM can be constructed on top of an existing aligned LLM by incorporating a robust alignment checking function, without requiring expensive retraining or fine-tuning processes. The effectiveness of RA-LLM in defending against alignment-breaking attacks is verified through theoretical analysis and real-world experiments on open-source large language models. The results demonstrate that RA-LLM successfully defends against both state-of-the-art adversarial prompts and popular handcrafted jailbreaking prompts. It significantly reduces their attack success rates from nearly 100% to around 10% or less. This research contributes to addressing the concerns surrounding the misuse of LLMs by providing a practical defense mechanism against alignment-breaking attacks. By implementing RA-LLM, developers and users of large language models can enhance their security and mitigate the risks associated with generating harmful or malicious content.
Created on 04 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.