A search for high-redshift direct collapse black hole candidates in the PEARLS north ecliptic pole field
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Direct-collapse black holes (DCBHs) are believed to be progenitors of supermassive black holes observed in quasars at high redshifts.
- DCBHs form in HI-cooling halos in the early Universe and have masses ranging from $10^4$ to $10^5 M_\odot$.
- Surrounding gas accretion can make DCBH seeds bright enough for detection with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) up to redshifts of about 15.
- A search for high-redshift DCBH candidates was conducted in the North Ecliptic Pole Time Domain Field (NEP) using JWST cycle-1 "PEARLS" survey data.
- Three objects consistent with DCBH models were identified, but distinguishing them from other sources remains challenging across different redshifts.
- Follow-up spectroscopy is necessary to determine the true nature of these objects.
- Two of the identified DCBH candidates are suitable for practical follow-up spectroscopy.
- The study sets a conservative upper limit on the comoving density of host halos capable of hosting similar DCBHs at $z\approx 6$-13, which is approximately $7\times 10^{-4}$ cMpc$^{-3}$.
- The study provides valuable insights into searching for high-redshift DCBH candidates and highlights challenges in distinguishing them from other astrophysical sources.
Authors: Armin Nabizadeh, Erik Zackrisson, Fabio Pacucci, Peter W. Maksym, Weihui Li, Francesca Civano, Seth H. Cohen, Jordan C. J. D'Silva, Anton M. Koekemoer, Jake Summers, Rogier A. Windhorst, Nathan Adams, Christopher J. Conselice, Dan Coe, Simon P. Driver, Brenda Frye, Norman A. Grogin, Rolf A. Jansen, Madeline A. Marshall, Mario Nonino, Nor Pirzkal, Aaron Robotham, Michael J. Rutkowski, Russell E. Ryan, Jr., Scott Tompkins, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Haojing Yan, Jose M. Diego, Cheng Cheng, Steven L. Finkelstein, S. P. Willner, Adi Zitrin, Rachana Bhatawdekar, Hansung B. Gim
Abstract: Direct-collapse black holes (DCBHs) of mass $\sim 10^4$-$10^5 M_\odot$ that form in HI-cooling halos in the early Universe are promising progenitors of the $\gtrsim 10^9 M_\odot$ supermassive black holes that fuel the observed $z \gtrsim 7$ quasars. Efficient accretion of the surrounding gas onto such DCBH seeds may render them sufficiently bright for detection with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) up to $z\approx 15$. Additionally, the very steep and red spectral slope predicted across the $\approx 1$-5 $\mu$m wavelength range of the JWST/NIRSpec instrument during their initial growth phase should make them photometrically identifiable up to very high redshifts. Here, we present a search for such DCBH candidates across the 34 arcmin$^{2}$ in the first two spokes of the JWST cycle-1 "Prime Extragalactic Areas for Reionization and Lensing Science" (PEARLS) survey of the North Ecliptic Pole Time Domain Field (NEP), covering 8 NIRCam filters down to a maximum depth of $\sim$ 29 AB mag. We identify three objects with spectral energy distributions consistent with the Pacucci et al. (2016) DCBH models. However, we also note that even with data in 8 NIRCam filters, objects of this type remain degenerate with dusty galaxies and obscured active galactic nuclei over a wide range of redshifts. Follow-up spectroscopy would be required to pin down the nature of these objects, and two of our DCBH candidates are sufficiently bright to make this practical. Based on our sample of DCBH candidates and assumptions on the typical duration of the DCBH steep-slope state, we set a conservative upper limit of $\approx 7\times 10^{-4}$ comoving Mpc$^{-3}$ (cMpc$^{-3}$) on the comoving density of host halos capable of hosting DCBHs with spectral energy distributions similar to the Pacucci et al. (2016) models at $z\approx 6$-13.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.