Gaussian Process Regression for Maximum Entropy Distribution
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Gaussian processes used to approximate Lagrange multipliers in Maximum-Entropy Distributions
- Lagrange multipliers computationally challenging to find in moment closure problems
- Investigating if Gaussian priors can effectively approximate Lagrange multipliers based on given moments
- Examining different kernel functions and optimizing hyperparameters through maximizing log-likelihood
- Evaluating performance of data-driven Maximum-Entropy closure approach using Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook and Boltzmann kinetic equations
- Novel method for addressing moment closure problems by leveraging Gaussian processes
- Promising performance demonstrated in various test cases, potential for practical closure settings
Authors: Mohsen Sadr, Manuel Torrilhon, M. Hossein Gorji
Abstract: Maximum-Entropy Distributions offer an attractive family of probability densities suitable for moment closure problems. Yet finding the Lagrange multipliers which parametrize these distributions, turns out to be a computational bottleneck for practical closure settings. Motivated by recent success of Gaussian processes, we investigate the suitability of Gaussian priors to approximate the Lagrange multipliers as a map of a given set of moments. Examining various kernel functions, the hyperparameters are optimized by maximizing the log-likelihood. The performance of the devised data-driven Maximum-Entropy closure is studied for couple of test cases including relaxation of non-equilibrium distributions governed by Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook and Boltzmann kinetic equations.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.