A Search for Technosignatures Around 11,680 Stars with the Green Bank Telescope at 1.15-1.73 GHz

AI-generated keywords: SETI Radio Signals Pipeline Efficiency Drake Figure of Merit Technosignatures

AI-generated Key Points

  • Conducted search for narrowband radio signals using the L-band receiver of the Green Bank Telescope
  • Observed 62 TESS Objects of Interest, capturing radio emissions from approximately 11,860 stars and planetary systems
  • Detected signals were confirmed to be of anthropogenic origin, ruling out extraterrestrial technosignatures
  • UCLA SETI pipeline demonstrated high signal recovery rate (94.0% excluding RFI, 98.7% overall)
  • Another pipeline utilizing incoherent sums of consecutive spectra achieved a significantly lower recovery rate (approximately 6%)
  • Developed an improved Drake Figure of Merit for SETI search volume calculations to account for pipeline efficiency and frequency drift rate coverage
  • High probability (94.0-98.7%) that less than ~0.014% of stars earlier than M8 within a distance of 100 parsecs host detectable transmitters with EIRP greater than 10^12 watts
  • UCLA SETI pipeline natively detects signals previously detected using AI techniques by Ma et al in 2023
  • Contributes to ongoing efforts in searching for extraterrestrial intelligence and highlights importance of pipeline efficiency in SETI research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jean-Luc Margot (Chester), Megan G. Li (Chester), Pavlo Pinchuk (Chester), Nathan Myhrvold (Chester), Lea E. Alcantara (Chester), Megan T. Andrakin (Chester), Jeth Arunseangroj (Chester), Damien S. Baclet (Chester), Madison H. Belk (Chester), Zerxes R. Bhadha (Chester), Nicholas W. Brandis (Chester), Robert E. Carey (Chester), Harrison P. Cassar (Chester), Sai S. Chava (Chester), Calvin Chen (Chester), James Chen (Chester), Kellen T. Cheng (Chester), Alessia Cimbri (Chester), Benjamin Cloutier (Chester), Jordan A. Combitsis (Chester), Kelly L. Couvrette (Chester), Brandon P. Coy (Chester), Kyle W. Davis (Chester), Antoine F. Delcayre (Chester), Michelle R. Du (Chester), Sarah E. Feil (Chester), Danning Fu (Chester), Travis J. Gilmore (Chester), Emery Grahill-Bland (Chester), Laura M. Iglesias (Chester), Zoe Juneau (Chester), Anthony G. Karapetian (Chester), George Karfakis (Chester), Christopher T. Lambert (Chester), Eric A. Lazbin (Chester), Jian H. Li (Chester), Zhuofu (Chester), Li (Cindy), Darren J. Lu (Cindy), Detao Ma (Cindy), Vedant Mathur (Cindy), Mary H. Minasyan (Cindy), Mark T. Nasielski (Cindy), Janice T. Nguyen (Cindy), Lorraine M. Nicholson (Cindy), Divij Ohri (Cindy), Atharva U. Padhye (Cindy), Supreethi V. Penmetcha (Cindy), Yugantar Prakash (Cindy), Xinyi (Cindy), Qi, Vedant Sahu, Joshua A. Scally, Zefyr Scott, Trevor J. Seddon, Lara-Lynn V. Shohet, Anchal Sinha, Anthony E. Sinigiani, Jiuxu Song, Spencer M. Stice, Andria Uplisashvili, Krishna Vanga, Amaury G. Vazquez, George Vetushko, Valeria Villa, Maria Vincent, Ian J. Waasdorp, Ian B. Wagaman, Amanda Wang, Jade C. Wight, Ella Wong, Natsuko Yamaguchi, Zijin Zhang, Junyang Zhao, Ryan S. Lynch

arXiv: 2308.02712v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
17 pages, 8 figures, submitted
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: We conducted a search for narrowband radio signals over four observing sessions in 2020-2023 with the L-band receiver (1.15-1.73 GHz) of the 100 m diameter Green Bank Telescope. We pointed the telescope in the directions of 62 TESS Objects of Interest, capturing radio emissions from a total of ~11,860 stars and planetary systems in the ~9 arcminute beam of the telescope. All detections were either automatically rejected or visually inspected and confirmed to be of anthropogenic nature. In this work, we also quantified the end-to-end efficiency of radio SETI pipelines with a signal injection and recovery analysis. The UCLA SETI pipeline recovers 94.0% of the injected signals over the usable frequency range of the receiver and 98.7% of the injections when regions of dense RFI are excluded. In another pipeline that uses incoherent sums of 51 consecutive spectra, the recovery rate is ~15 times smaller at ~6%. The pipeline efficiency affects SETI search volume calculations as well as calculations of upper bounds on the number of transmitting civilizations. We developed an improved Drake Figure of Merit for SETI search volume calculations that includes the pipeline efficiency and frequency drift rate coverage. Based on our observations, we found that there is a high probability (94.0-98.7%) that fewer than ~0.014% of stars earlier than M8 within 100 pc host a transmitter that is detectable in our search (EIRP > 10e12 W). Finally, we showed that the UCLA SETI pipeline natively detects the signals detected with AI techniques by Ma et al., 2023.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.02712v1

In this study, the authors conducted a search for narrowband radio signals using the L-band receiver (1.15-1.73 GHz) of the 100 m diameter Green Bank Telescope. The observations were carried out over four observing sessions from 2020 to 2023 and pointed towards 62 TESS Objects of Interest, resulting in the capture of radio emissions from approximately 11,860 stars and planetary systems within the telescope's ~9 arcminute beam. All detections were carefully examined through an automated rejection process and subsequent visual inspection which confirmed that all detected signals were of anthropogenic origin, ruling out any potential extraterrestrial technosignatures. Additionally, the authors assessed the efficiency of radio SETI pipelines by conducting a signal injection and recovery analysis. The UCLA SETI pipeline demonstrated a high recovery rate, successfully recovering 94.0% of injected signals across the usable frequency range of the receiver when excluding regions with dense radio frequency interference (RFI), this recovery rate increased to 98.7%. In contrast, another pipeline that utilized incoherent sums of consecutive spectra only achieved a recovery rate of approximately 6%, which is significantly lower. The efficiency of SETI pipelines has implications for various calculations related to SETI search volumes and upper bounds on the number of transmitting civilizations; thus to account for pipeline efficiency and frequency drift rate coverage, the authors developed an improved Drake Figure of Merit for SETI search volume calculations. Based on their observations and analysis it was determined that there is a high probability (94.0-98.7%) that less than ~0.014% of stars earlier than M8 within a distance of 100 parsecs host detectable transmitters with an equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) greater than 10^12 watts; furthermore it was found that the UCLA SETI pipeline natively detects signals previously detected using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques by Ma et al in 2023. Overall this study contributes to ongoing efforts in searching for extraterrestrial intelligence and highlights importance in pipeline efficiency in SETI research; providing valuable insights into detectability technosignatures as well as informing future studies aiming to expand our understanding potential technological civilizations beyond Earth.
Created on 09 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.