A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Human Language?

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Language Models Human Linguistic Performance Theoretical Understanding Practical Application

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Artificial Intelligence applications have demonstrated potential in language-related tasks relying on next-word prediction.
  • Large language models are associated with claims about human-like linguistic performance, advancing understanding of human language.
  • The study analyzes the contribution of large language models as theoretically informative representations compared to mechanistic tools.
  • Large language models may lack deep insights into the mechanisms of human language processing and theoretical grounding.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between theoretical understanding and practical application.
  • Despite limitations, large language models offer valuable insights into AI in language-related tasks and natural language processing advancements.
  • Important abilities are missing from current models that need to be addressed for enhanced performance and representation of human linguistic abilities.
  • More work is needed to develop theoretically informed representations and address limitations for further advancements in AI applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gary Marcus, Evelina Leivada, Elliot Murphy

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence applications show great potential for language-related tasks that rely on next-word prediction. The current generation of large language models have been linked to claims about human-like linguistic performance and their applications are hailed both as a key step towards Artificial General Intelligence and as major advance in understanding the cognitive, and even neural basis of human language. We analyze the contribution of large language models as theoretically informative representations of a target system vs. atheoretical powerful mechanistic tools, and we identify the key abilities that are still missing from the current state of development and exploitation of these models.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.00109v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Artificial Intelligence applications have demonstrated immense potential in language-related tasks that rely on next-word prediction. The current generation of large language models has been associated with claims about their human-like linguistic performance, making them a crucial step towards Artificial General Intelligence and a significant advancement in understanding the cognitive and neural basis of human language. In this study, conducted by Gary Marcus, Evelina Leivada, and Elliot Murphy, the authors analyze the contribution of these large language models as theoretically informative representations of a target system compared to atheoretical powerful mechanistic tools. They also identify the key abilities that are still lacking in the current state of development and exploitation of these models. The authors argue that while large language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in predicting subsequent words in a sentence, they may not provide deep insights into the underlying mechanisms of human language processing. These models serve as powerful tools for generating text but may lack theoretical grounding. The study highlights the need for further research to bridge the gap between theoretical understanding and practical application. Despite their limitations, large language models offer valuable insights into the potential of AI in language-related tasks. They have paved the way for advancements in natural language processing and have sparked discussions about the future development of Artificial General Intelligence. However, there are still important abilities missing from these models that need to be addressed. This study sheds light on areas where improvements can be made to enhance their performance and make them more representative of human linguistic abilities. In conclusion, while large language models have shown promise in next-word prediction tasks and have contributed to our understanding of human language, there is still much work to be done. Further research is needed to develop more theoretically informed representations and address the limitations present in current models. By doing so, we can continue advancing AI applications in language-related tasks and move closer towards achieving Artificial General Intelligence.
Created on 21 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.