Self-recognition generates characteristic responses in pupil dynamics and microsaccade rate

AI-generated keywords: Self-recognition Visual Fixation Pupil Dynamics Microsaccades Authentication

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on relationship between visual fixation and self-recognition
  • Examines pupil dynamics and microsaccades during the process
  • Experiment used visual fixation task to compare pupil size and microsaccade rate for own face, familiar faces, and unfamiliar faces
  • Results show distinct patterns in both pupil size and microsaccade rate during self-recognition
  • Own face leads to muted constriction followed by greater dilation of pupils
  • Microsaccades are more strongly inhibited in response to own face compared to other faces
  • Eye-related physiological measures could be used for authentication or detecting hidden knowledge
  • Provides insights into active process of visual fixation and its connection to self-recognition
  • Highlights distinct patterns observed in pupil size and microsaccade rate for self-recognition compared to other faces
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lisa Schwetlick, Hendrik Graupner, Olaf Dimigen, Ralf Engbert

arXiv: 2307.15239v2 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
22 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Visual fixation is an active process with pupil dynamics as well as fixational eye movements and microsaccades that support perception. Measures of both pupil contraction and microsaccades are known to be sensitive to ongoing cognition and emotional processing. Here we present experimental results from a visual fixation task demonstrating that pupil size and microsaccade rate respond differently during self-recognition (when seeing one's own face) than when seeing familiar or unfamiliar faces. First, the pupil response is characterized by an immediate pupil-constriction followed by later dilation in response to stimulus onsets. For one's own face, we observe muted constriction and greater dilation compared to other faces. Second, microsaccades, which generally show an inhibitory response to incoming stimuli, are more strongly inhibited in response to one's own face compared to other faces. Our results lend support to the idea that eye-related physiological measures could be useful for authentication or exposing hidden knowledge.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.15239v2

The study focuses on the relationship between visual fixation and self-recognition, specifically examining pupil dynamics and microsaccades during the process. The researchers conducted an experiment using a visual fixation task to investigate how pupil size and microsaccade rate differ when individuals see their own face compared to familiar or unfamiliar faces. The results revealed distinct patterns in both pupil size and microsaccade rate during self-recognition. When participants saw their own face, there was a muted constriction of the pupils followed by greater dilation compared to other faces. In contrast, microsaccades, which typically show an inhibitory response to incoming stimuli, were more strongly inhibited in response to one's own face compared to other faces. These findings suggest that eye-related physiological measures such as pupil dynamics and microsaccades could potentially be used for authentication or detecting hidden knowledge. The study provides valuable insights into the active process of visual fixation and its connection to self-recognition, indicating that eye-related physiological measures can be used for authentication purposes or detecting hidden knowledge. Furthermore, it highlights the distinct patterns observed in both pupil size and microsaccade rate when individuals recognize themselves in comparison with other familiar or unfamiliar faces.
Created on 09 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.