The HERBAL model: A hierarchical errors-in-variables Bayesian lognormal hurdle model for galactic globular cluster populations
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Relationship between galaxy stellar mass and size of globular cluster (GC) populations
- Well-established relationship for Milky Way-sized and larger galaxies
- Ambiguity for dwarf galaxies, evidence suggesting a downturn in GC population size at low galaxy masses
- Introduce new model called HERBAL to accurately represent relationship for dwarf galaxies
- HERBAL model considers two distinct populations: those with GCs and those without
- Takes into account various uncertainties, including measurement uncertainty, conversions, and scatter
- Applied HERBAL model to Local Group galaxies with maximal coverage of luminosity range
- At stellar mass $\log_{10}(M_*)=6.996$, approximately 50% of galaxies expected to host GC populations
- Expected mass of GC populations remains linear even for smallest galaxies
- Hierarchical nature of Bayesian HERBAL model allows estimation of galaxy masses and individual mass-to-light ratios using luminosity data within the framework
- Used model to recover accurate estimate of Milky Way's stellar mass
- Non-zero intrinsic scatter found with value of $0.59_{-0.21}^{+0.30}$ (95% credible interval)
- Importance of accounting for intrinsic scatter in future models emphasized
Authors: Samantha C. Berek, Gwendolyn M. Eadie, Joshua S. Speagle, William E. Harris
Abstract: Galaxy stellar mass is known to be monotonically related to the size of the galaxy's globular cluster (GC) population for Milky Way sized and larger galaxies. However, the relation becomes ambiguous for dwarf galaxies, where there is some evidence for a downturn in GC population size at low galaxy masses. Smaller dwarfs are increasingly likely to have no GCs, and these zeros cannot be easily incorporated into linear models. We introduce the Hierarchical ERrors-in-variables Bayesian lognormAL hurdle (HERBAL) model to represent the relationship between dwarf galaxies and their GC populations, and apply it to the sample of Local Group galaxies where the luminosity range coverage is maximal. This bimodal model accurately represents the two populations of dwarf galaxies: those that have GCs and those that do not. Our model thoroughly accounts for all uncertainties, including measurement uncertainty, uncertainty in luminosity to stellar mass conversions, and intrinsic scatter. The hierarchical nature of our Bayesian model also allows us to estimate galaxy masses and individual mass-to-light ratios from luminosity data within the model. We find that 50% of galaxies are expected to host globular cluster populations at a stellar mass of $\log_{10}(M_*)=6.996$, and that the expected mass of GC populations remains linear down to the smallest galaxies. Our hierarchical model recovers an accurate estimate of the Milky Way stellar mass. Under our assumed error model, we find a non-zero intrinsic scatter of $0.59_{-0.21}^{+0.30}$ (95% credible interval) that should be accounted for in future models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.