Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.08846v1

The study of the connection between inner small planets and outer giant planets is crucial for our understanding of planet formation across a wide range of orbital separations. While Kepler provided a plethora of compact multi-planet systems at short separations ($\lesssim 1$ AU), relatively little is known about the occurrence of giant companions at larger separations and how they impact the architectures of the inner systems. In this paper, Matthias Y. He and Lauren M. Weiss use the catalog of systems from the Kepler Giant Planet Search (KGPS) to investigate how the architectures of inner transiting planets correlate with the presence of outer giant planets. The authors find that for systems with at least three small transiting planets, there appears to be a difference in the distribution of inner-system gap complexity ($\mathcal{C}$), a measure of deviation from uniform spacings, between those with an outer giant planet ($50 M_\oplus \leq M_p\sin{i} \leq 13 M_{\rm Jup}$) and those without any outer giants. All four inner systems (with 3+ transiting planets) with outer giant(s) have a higher gap complexity ($\mathcal{C} > 0.32$) than 79% (19/24) of the inner systems without any outer giants (median $\mathcal{C} \simeq 0.06$). This suggests that one can predict the occurrence of outer giant companions by selecting multi-transiting systems with highly irregular spacings. To address concerns about multiple comparisons due to several tests and metrics used in this study to test for differences in architectures between inner systems with versus without outer giant planets, additional analyses such as bootstrapping and permutation tests were conducted. Interestingly, no correlation was found between outer giant occurrence and size similarity or ordering patterns of the inner planets. This implies that larger gap complexities in inner systems with an outer giant may indicate that massive external planets play an important role in forming or disrupting these configurations. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the connection between inner and outer planetary systems and highlights the importance of considering irregularities in spacing when predicting occurrences of outer giant companions.

• - The study of the connection between inner small planets and outer giant planets is crucial for understanding planet formation across a wide range of orbital separations.
• - Kepler provided many compact multi-planet systems at short separations, but little is known about the occurrence of giant companions at larger separations and how they impact inner system architectures.
• - Matthias Y. He and Lauren M. Weiss used the catalog of systems from the Kepler Giant Planet Search (KGPS) to investigate how the architectures of inner transiting planets correlate with the presence of outer giant planets.
• - For systems with at least three small transiting planets, there appears to be a difference in the distribution of inner-system gap complexity between those with an outer giant planet and those without any outer giants.
• - All four inner systems (with 3+ transiting planets) with outer giants have a higher gap complexity than 79% of the inner systems without any outer giants.
• - This suggests that one can predict the occurrence of outer giant companions by selecting multi-transiting systems with highly irregular spacings.
• - No correlation was found between outer giant occurrence and size similarity or ordering patterns of the inner planets.
• - Larger gap complexities in inner systems with an outer giant may indicate that massive external planets play an important role in forming or disrupting these configurations.
• - Considering irregularities in spacing is important when predicting occurrences of outer giant companions.

Scientists studied how small planets inside a solar system are connected to big planets outside the solar system. They used information from the Kepler Giant Planet Search to see how outer giant planets affect inner transiting planets. They found that systems with at least three small transiting planets have more complex gaps in their orbits when they have an outer giant planet compared to those without one. This means that scientists can predict if there is an outer giant planet by looking for multi-transiting systems with irregular spacings. The size and order of inner planets do not affect the occurrence of outer giants. Definitions- Solar system: a group of planets and other objects that orbit around a star - Transiting planet: a planet that passes in front of its star, causing a dip in brightness - Orbit: the path that an object takes as it moves around another object - Occurrence: how often something happens or appears - Irregular: not following a regular pattern or shape

Exploring the Connection Between Inner Small Planets and Outer Giant Planets

In recent years, astronomers have made great strides in understanding planet formation across a wide range of orbital separations. The Kepler mission provided us with an abundance of compact multi-planet systems at short separations ($\lesssim 1$ AU). However, relatively little is known about the occurrence of giant companions at larger separations and how they impact the architectures of inner systems. To investigate this connection between small planets and outer giants, Matthias Y. He and Lauren M. Weiss conducted a study using the catalog of systems from the Kepler Giant Planet Search (KGPS).

Measuring Gap Complexity

The authors used a metric called gap complexity ($\mathcal{C}$) to measure deviation from uniform spacings in inner planetary systems. This metric was calculated for each system based on its configuration of transiting planets. Systems with higher gap complexities indicate more irregularly spaced planets than those with lower values.

Results

He and Weiss found that for systems with at least three small transiting planets, there appears to be a difference in gap complexity between those with an outer giant planet ($50 M_\oplus \leq M_p\sin{i} \leq 13 M_{\rm Jup}$) and those without any outer giants. All four inner systems (with 3+ transiting planets) with outer giant(s) had higher gap complexities ($\mathcal{C} > 0.32$) than 79% (19/24) of the inner systems without any outer giants (median $\mathcal{C} \simeq 0.06$). This suggests that one can predict the occurrence of outer giant companions by selecting multi-transiting systems with highly irregular spacings. To address concerns about multiple comparisons due to several tests and metrics used in this study to test for differences in architectures between inner systems with versus without outer giant planets, additional analyses such as bootstrapping and permutation tests were conducted which yielded similar results as before: no correlation was found between outer giant occurrence and size similarity or ordering patterns of the inner planets; however, larger gap complexities were observed in inner planetary configurations when an outer giant was present compared to those without any external giants present suggesting massive external planets play an important role in forming or disrupting these configurations..

Conclusion

Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how large scale architecture affects smaller scale dynamics within planetary formations around stars like our own Sun - specifically highlighting irregularities in spacing as being indicative for predicting occurrences of external companion objects such as gas giants orbiting further out beyond our solar system's asteroid belt region .