Economical Accommodations for Neurodivergent Students in Software Engineering Education: Experiences from an Intervention in Four Undergraduate Courses
AI-generated Key Points
- Neurodiversity refers to variation in brain function among individuals, including conditions like ADHD and dyslexia
- Neurodivergent (ND) individuals have specific strengths like creativity and attention to detail
- Inclusion of ND individuals is important for economic, ethical, and talent reasons
- Higher education often lacks awareness and accommodations for ND students, leading to stress and dropout risk
- Intervention conducted in four undergraduate computer science courses at Reykjavik University focused on creating tailored course material for ND audiences based on accessibility guidelines
- Small changes made to course material such as left-aligned text, avoiding multi-column layouts, and using cream-colored backgrounds instead of plain white
- Adapting writing style by avoiding passive voice, using concise sentences, and avoiding jargon recommended
- Intervention implemented in three courses during fall term 2021 and one more course in spring term 2022
- Approximately 10% of students at Reykjavik University have a diagnosed ND condition
- Prior to intervention, accommodations for ND students were limited to extended exam times
- Implemented accommodations included style changes in assignments and lecture slides; improved clarity and structure; minor changes in sensory environment; raising awareness about neurodiversity and accommodations
- Results of two surveys showed overall positive response from both ND students and neurotypical (NT) students regarding interventions
- Majority agreed that the ND-friendly material helped them understand the course material better
- Higher percentage of ND students agreed that interventions were beneficial compared to NT students
- Study highlights importance of making small but impactful changes to accommodate ND students in higher education settings.
Authors: Grischa Liebel, Steinunn Gróa Sigurðardóttir
Abstract: Neurodiversity is an umbrella term that describes variation in brain function among individuals, including conditions such as Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or dyslexia. Neurodiversity is common in the general population, with an estimated 5.0% to 7.1% and 7% of the world population being diagnosed with ADHD and dyslexia respectively. Neurodivergent (ND) individuals often experience challenges in specific tasks, such as difficulties in communication or a reduced attention span in comparison to neurotypical (NT) individuals. However, they also exhibit specific strengths, such as high creativity or attention to detail. Therefore, improving the inclusion of ND individuals is desirable for economic, ethical, and for talent reasons. In higher education, struggles of ND students are well-documented. Common issues in this area are a lack of awareness among other students and staff, forms of assessment that are particularly challenging for some students, and a lack of offered accommodations. These factors commonly lead to stress, anxiety, and ultimately a risk of dropping out of the studies. Accommodations for ND students can require substantial effort. However, smaller changes in course material can already have major impact. In this chapter, we summarise the lessons learned from an intervention in four courses in undergraduate computer science programmes at Reykjavik University, Iceland, over a period of two terms. Following accessibility guidelines produced by interest groups for different ND conditions, we created course material in the form of slides and assignments specifically tailored to ND audiences. We focused on small, economical changes that could be replicated by educators with a minimal investment of time. We evaluated the success of our intervention through two surveys, showing an overall positive response among ND students and NT students.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.