Towards Alleviating the Object Bias in Prompt Tuning-based Factual Knowledge Extraction
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors address the issue of object bias in prompt tuning methods for factual knowledge extraction
- They propose a novel prompt tuning method called MeCoD
- MeCoD consists of three modules: Prompt Encoder, Object Equalization, and Biased Object Obstruction
- The Prompt Encoder module accurately captures relevant information from prompts
- The Object Equalization module equalizes the representation of different objects to mitigate bias
- The Biased Object Obstruction module introduces perturbations during training to obstruct biased objects
- Experiments show that MeCoD significantly reduces object bias and improves accuracy in factual knowledge extraction
- This paper provides an innovative approach to address object bias and improve reliability and fairness in automated knowledge extraction.
Authors: Yuhang Wang, Dongyuan Lu, Chao Kong, Jitao Sang
Abstract: Many works employed prompt tuning methods to automatically optimize prompt queries and extract the factual knowledge stored in Pretrained Language Models. In this paper, we observe that the optimized prompts, including discrete prompts and continuous prompts, exhibit undesirable object bias. To handle this problem, we propose a novel prompt tuning method called MeCoD. consisting of three modules: Prompt Encoder, Object Equalization and Biased Object Obstruction. Experimental results show that MeCoD can significantly reduce the object bias and at the same time improve accuracy of factual knowledge extraction.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.