Zero is Not Hero Yet: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Performance of LLMs for Financial Tasks
AI-generated Key Points
- This paper explores the effectiveness of zero-shot large language models (LLMs) in the financial domain, specifically focusing on ChatGPT.
- The authors compare the performance of ChatGPT with open-source generative LLMs and RoBERTa fine-tuned on annotated data.
- Three research questions are addressed: data annotation, performance gaps, and feasibility of using generative models in finance.
- LLMs like ChatGPT have shown impressive performance without labeled data, but fine-tuned models generally outperform ChatGPT.
- Annotating with generative models is time-intensive.
- Four financial NLP tasks are used to benchmark different models.
- Key insights from the study include:
- Zero-shot ChatGPT performs impressively across all tasks without labeled data, but doesn't outperform fine-tuned PLMs.
- Performance gap between fine-tuned PLMs and ChatGPT is larger when datasets are not publicly available yet.
- Fully open source LLMs perform significantly lower than ChatGPT for financial tasks.
- Using generative LLMs for labeling data can be 1000 times more time consuming compared to fine tuned PLMs.
- The paper discusses various datasets used in the study related to hawkish dovish sequence classification, financial sentiment analysis, financial numerical claim detection, and named entity recognition.
- Overall, this paper provides insights into how well ChatGPT performs with zero shot on various NLP tasks in the financial domain and compares it with other generative LLMs and fine-tuned PLMs. It also highlights performance gaps, feasibility of using generative models, and time required for data annotation in finance research projects.
Authors: Agam Shah, Sudheer Chava
Abstract: Recently large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have shown impressive performance on many natural language processing tasks with zero-shot. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of zero-shot LLMs in the financial domain. We compare the performance of ChatGPT along with some open-source generative LLMs in zero-shot mode with RoBERTa fine-tuned on annotated data. We address three inter-related research questions on data annotation, performance gaps, and the feasibility of employing generative models in the finance domain. Our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT performs well even without labeled data but fine-tuned models generally outperform it. Our research also highlights how annotating with generative models can be time-intensive. Our codebase is publicly available on GitHub under CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.