An Open-Access Database of Active-source and Passive-wavefield DAS and Nodal Station Measurements at the Newberry Florida Site

AI-generated keywords: Stress Wave Subsurface Imaging Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) SmartSolo 3C Nodal Stations Vibrational Impact Sources

AI-generated Key Points

  • A subsurface imaging experiment was conducted in Newberry, Florida using stress waves
  • The site has significant spatial variability and contains karstic surface and underground voids and anomalies
  • Advanced sensing technologies were used, including a dense 2D array of 1920 distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) fiber optic cable channels and a 12 x 12 grid of 144 SmartSolo 3C nodal stations covering an area of 155 m x 75 m
  • Both active-source and passive-wavefield data were recorded using the DAS and nodal stations
  • Active-source data was generated by a variety of vibrational and impact sources, including a powerful three-dimensional vibroseis shaker truck, a 40-kg propelled energy generator (PEG-40kg), and an 8-lb sledgehammer
  • Four hours of ambient noise were recorded using the DAS, while the nodal stations recorded 48 hours of ambient noise in four twelve-hour increments over four days
  • The collected waveforms from every active-source shot or passive-wavefield time block were extracted, processed, and stored in H5 files that can be easily visualized using Python scripts incorporated with the open-access dataset
  • Supporting metadata documents include field handwritten notes converted to digital format describing the dataset; information on SmartSolo nodal stations such as serial numbers, station names, location codes, and both local and global coordinates; frequency instrument response curves for the vertical and horizontal geophones in the nodal stations; cable information containing DAS channel indices, local and global coordinates for each corner along the fiber optic cable as well as its start and end points; T-Rex source information providing details on all shots; plus impact sources information providing details on all shots.
  • The dataset has been archived and made publicly available on DesignSafe for researchers developing techniques for voids detection or anomaly detection using noninvasive stress wave based subsurface imaging techniques
  • This unique dataset is expected to be a valuable resource for present or future researchers who need high quality experimental datasets with known or unknown anomaly locations for testing imaging methods as demonstrated by examples provided within this paper.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Aser Abbas, Brady R. Cox, Khiem T. Tran, Isabella Corey, Nishkarsha Dawadi

arXiv: 2305.15578v1 - DOI (physics.geo-ph)
33 pages, 12 figures, dataset paper
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: This paper documents a comprehensive subsurface imaging experiment using stress waves in Newberry, Florida, at a site known for significant spatial variability, karstic voids, and underground anomalies. The experiment utilized advanced sensing technologies, including approximately two kilometers of distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) fiber optic cable, forming a dense 2D array of 1920 channels, and a 2D array of 144 three-component nodal stations, to sense active-source and passive-wavefield stress waves. The active-source data was generated using a vibroseis shaker truck and impact sources, and it was simultaneously sensed by both the DAS and the nodal stations. The vibroseis truck was used to excite the ground in the three directions at 260 locations inside and outside the instrumented array, while the impact sources were used at 268 locations within the instrumented array. The passive-wavefield data recorded using the nodal stations comprised 48 hours of ambient noise collected over a period of four days in four twelve-hour time blocks. Meanwhile, the passive wavefield data collected using DAS consisted of four hours of ambient noise recordings. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the testing site, experiment layout, the DAS and nodal station acquisition parameters, implemented processing steps, and potential use cases of the dataset. While potential use cases, such as surface wave testing, full waveform inversion, and ambient noise tomography, are discussed relative to example data, the focus of this paper is on documenting this unique dataset rather than on processing the data for detecting anomalies or generating subsurface 2D/3D imaging results. The raw and processed data, along with detailed documentation of the experiment and Python tools to aid in visualizing the DAS dataset have been archived and made publicly available on DesignSafe under project PRJ-3521.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.15578v1

This research paper presents a comprehensive subsurface imaging experiment conducted in Newberry, Florida, using stress waves. The site is known for its significant spatial variability and contains karstic surface and underground voids and anomalies. The experiment utilized advanced sensing technologies, including a dense 2D array of 1920 distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) fiber optic cable channels and a 12 x 12 grid of 144 SmartSolo 3C nodal stations covering an area of 155 m x 75 m. Both active-source and passive-wavefield data were recorded using the DAS and nodal stations. The active-source data was generated by a variety of vibrational and impact sources, including a powerful three-dimensional vibroseis shaker truck, a 40-kg propelled energy generator (PEG-40kg), and an 8-lb sledgehammer. The vibroseis shaker truck was used to vibrate the ground in the three directions at 260 locations inside and outside the instrumented area, while the impact sources were used at 268 locations inside the instrumented area. In addition to active source data, four hours of ambient noise were recorded using the DAS, while the nodal stations recorded 48 hours of ambient noise in four twelve-hour increments over four days. The collected waveforms from every active-source shot or passive-wavefield time block were extracted, processed, and stored in H5 files that can be easily visualized using Python scripts incorporated with the open-access dataset. The three-component data gathered from each SmartSolo nodal station were consolidated into a single miniSEED file. All necessary information has been systematically organized into three parent folders - raw data, processed data, and supporting documents - with consistent naming conventions employed for all files and folders. Supporting metadata documents include field handwritten notes converted to digital format describing the dataset; information on SmartSolo nodal stations such as serial numbers, station names, location codes, and both local and global coordinates; frequency instrument response curves for the vertical and horizontal geophones in the nodal stations; cable information containing DAS channel indices, local and global coordinates for each corner along the fiber optic cable as well as its start and end points; T-Rex source information providing details on all shots; plus impact sources information providing details on all shots. The dataset has been archived and made publicly available on DesignSafe for researchers developing techniques for voids detection or anomaly detection using noninvasive stress wave based subsurface imaging techniques. This unique dataset is expected to be a valuable resource for present or future researchers who need high quality experimental datasets with known or unknown anomaly locations for testing imaging methods as demonstrated by examples provided within this paper.
Created on 07 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.