Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and Implications for AI-Integrated Education

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Education AI Self-efficacy Critical Thinking

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores user perspectives on the use of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot technology, in various education sectors.
  • The study aims to answer two research questions: the primary applications of ChatGPT in education and the various perceptions of the technology.
  • Findings indicate that ChatGPT is most commonly used in higher education (24.18%), K-12 education (22.09%) and practical-skills learning (15.28%).
  • On social media platforms, productivity, efficiency and ethics are the most frequently discussed topics about ChatGPT.
  • Early adopters generally view ChatGPT as a revolutionary technology with potential benefits for boosting students' self-efficacy and motivation to learn.
  • However some express concern that overreliance on AI systems may promote superficial learning habits and erode critical thinking skills.
  • The study offers recommendations based on crowd-sourced knowledge for educators interested in incorporating ChatGPT into their educational settings.
  • Additionally, the authors propose a research agenda for future studies investigating the application of ChatGPT in education.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Reza Hadi Mogavi, Chao Deng, Justin Juho Kim, Pengyuan Zhou, Young D. Kwon, Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally, Ahmed Tlili, Simone Bassanelli, Antonio Bucchiarone, Sujit Gujar, Lennart E. Nacke, Pan Hui

Preprint version

Abstract: Understanding user perspectives on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is essential for creating pedagogically effective and ethically responsible AI-integrated learning environments. In this paper, we conduct an extensive qualitative content analysis of four major social media platforms (Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, and LinkedIn) to explore the user experience (UX) and perspectives of early adopters toward ChatGPT-an AI Chatbot technology-in various education sectors. We investigate the primary applications of ChatGPT in education (RQ1) and the various perceptions of the technology (RQ2). Our findings indicate that ChatGPT is most popularly used in the contexts of higher education (24.18%), K-12 education (22.09%), and practical-skills learning (15.28%). On social media platforms, the most frequently discussed topics about ChatGPT are productivity, efficiency, and ethics. While early adopters generally lean toward seeing ChatGPT as a revolutionary technology with the potential to boost students' self-efficacy and motivation to learn, others express concern that overreliance on the AI system may promote superficial learning habits and erode students' social and critical thinking skills. Our study contributes to the broader discourse on Human-AI Interaction and offers recommendations based on crowd-sourced knowledge for educators and learners interested in incorporating ChatGPT into their educational settings. Furthermore, we propose a research agenda for future studies that sets the foundation for continued investigation into the application of ChatGPT in education.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.13114v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This paper explores user perspectives on the use of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot technology, in various education sectors. Through a qualitative content analysis of social media platforms including Twitter, Reddit, YouTube and LinkedIn, the study aims to answer two research questions: the primary applications of ChatGPT in education and the various perceptions of the technology. Findings indicate that ChatGPT is most commonly used in higher education (24.18%), K-12 education (22.09%) and practical-skills learning (15.28%). On social media platforms, productivity, efficiency and ethics are the most frequently discussed topics about ChatGPT. Early adopters generally view ChatGPT as a revolutionary technology with potential benefits for boosting students' self-efficacy and motivation to learn; however some express concern that overreliance on AI systems may promote superficial learning habits and erode critical thinking skills. The study contributes to Human-AI Interaction discourse by offering recommendations based on crowd-sourced knowledge for educators interested in incorporating ChatGPT into their educational settings. Additionally, the authors propose a research agenda for future studies investigating the application of ChatGPT in education.
Created on 03 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.