GPT Agents in Game Theory Experiments

AI-generated keywords: GPT strategic games social preferences AI-based agents human behavior

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Fulin Guo explores the potential of using Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based agents as participants in strategic game experiments.
  • The focus is on the finitely repeated ultimatum and prisoner's dilemma games, two well-studied games in economics.
  • GPT agents are given prompts to understand the game rules and play the games.
  • Results show that GPT can generate realistic outcomes and exhibit behavior consistent with human behavior in certain aspects.
  • Positive relationship between acceptance rates and offered amounts in the ultimatum game and positive cooperation rates in the prisoner's dilemma game are observed.
  • Differences between GPT and human behavior are observed in aspects like evolution of choices over rounds.
  • Two treatments are studied where GPT agents are prompted to have social preferences or not, with treatment effects evident in both games.
  • This study highlights how AI-based agents such as GPT can be used as experimental subjects for studying human behavior under different conditions.
  • Further research could explore more complex strategic interactions involving multiple players or more intricate decision-making processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Fulin Guo

36 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: This paper explores the potential of using Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based agents as participants in strategic game experiments. Specifically, I focus on the finitely repeated ultimatum and prisoner's dilemma games, two well-studied games in economics. I develop prompts to enable GPT agents to understand the game rules and play the games. The results indicate that, given well-crafted prompts, GPT can generate realistic outcomes and exhibit behavior consistent with human behavior in certain important aspects, such as positive relationship between acceptance rates and offered amounts in the ultimatum game and positive cooperation rates in the prisoner's dilemma game. Some differences between the behavior of GPT and humans are observed in aspects like the evolution of choices over rounds. I also study two treatments in which the GPT agents are prompted to either have social preferences or not. The treatment effects are evident in both games. This preliminary exploration indicates that GPT agents can exhibit realistic performance in simple strategic games and shows the potential of using GPT as a valuable tool in social science research.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.05516v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this paper, Fulin Guo explores the potential of using Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based agents as participants in strategic game experiments. Specifically, Guo focuses on the finitely repeated ultimatum and prisoner's dilemma games, two well-studied games in economics. The author develops prompts to enable GPT agents to understand the game rules and play the games. The results indicate that, given well-crafted prompts, GPT can generate realistic outcomes and exhibit behavior consistent with human behavior in certain important aspects. For instance, there is a positive relationship between acceptance rates and offered amounts in the ultimatum game and positive cooperation rates in the prisoner's dilemma game. However, some differences between the behavior of GPT and humans are observed in aspects like the evolution of choices over rounds. Moreover, Guo studies two treatments in which the GPT agents are prompted to either have social preferences or not. The treatment effects are evident in both games. This preliminary exploration indicates that GPT agents can exhibit realistic performance in simple strategic games and shows the potential of using GPT as a valuable tool for social science research. Overall, this study highlights how AI-based agents such as GPT can be used as experimental subjects for studying human behavior under different conditions. It also suggests that further research could explore more complex strategic interactions involving multiple players or more intricate decision-making processes.
Created on 12 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.