Whats next? Forecasting scientific research trends
AI-generated Key Points
- Scientific research trends and interests are constantly evolving
- It is crucial for educational institutions, practitioners, investors, and funding organizations to identify and forecast these trends
- Researchers aimed to predict future trends in scientific publications using a diverse list of 127 topics focused mostly on life science
- Heterogeneous public sources such as historical publications from PubMed, research and review articles, and patents were used to train forecasting models that could predict topic popularity five years in advance
- Normalized fraction of citations a paper received out of the total number of citations in PubMed each year was used instead of absolute quantities like the number of citations in a year
- Preceding publications and future patents served as leading indicators for emerging scientific topics
- Declining topics had an excess of reviews compared to original research articles while identifying increasing or declining topics based on their ratio
- Language models were used to provide improved insights into topic temporal dynamics across molecular, technological, and conceptual areas within biomedical research.
- The study provides a valuable framework for identifying and predicting scientific research trends using heterogeneous public sources.
- Long-term forecasting in this domain is possible.
Authors: Dan Ofer, Michal Linial
Abstract: Scientific research trends and interests evolve over time. The ability to identify and forecast these trends is vital for educational institutions, practitioners, investors, and funding organizations. In this study, we predict future trends in scientific publications using heterogeneous public sources, including historical publications from PubMed, research and review articles, and patents. We demonstrate that scientific trends can be predicted five years in advance, with preceding publications and future patents serving as leading indicators for emerging scientific topics. We found that the ratio of reviews to original research articles is an informative feature for identifying increasing or declining topics, with declining topics having an excess of reviews. We find that language models provide improved insights and predictions into topic temporal dynamics. Our findings suggest that similar dynamics apply to molecular, technological, and conceptual topics across biomedical research.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.