Speeding up quantum circuits simulation using ZX-Calculus

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Circuit ZX-diagram Matrix Product State (MPS) Sycamore Circuits Contraction Cost

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors propose a simple and efficient method to reduce contraction cost of tensor network for simulating quantum circuits
  • Circuit represented as ZX-diagram and sparsified using simplification and local complementation rules
  • Optimizing graph-like ZX-diagrams significantly improves existing state-of-the-art contraction cost by several orders of magnitude
  • Motivation is to understand limits of classical simulation of quantum circuits as quantum computing advances
  • Small circuits can be simulated using direct linear algebra simulation, larger circuits require more sophisticated approaches
  • Matrix Product State (MPS) formalism allows lossy simulation of large quantum systems in shallow circuit regimes
  • Restricting set of gates enables polynomial-time simulation
  • Method achieves significant improvements in contraction cost compared to existing techniques
  • For Sycamore circuits with depth 20, average contraction cost is 1180 times better than previous methods, up to 4200 times better at peak performance
  • Contributes to advancing field of quantum circuit simulation by reducing contraction costs through graph-like ZX-diagrams
  • Implications for improving efficiency and scalability of simulating complex quantum computations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tristan Cam, Simon Martiel

arXiv: 2305.02669v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present a simple and efficient way to reduce the contraction cost of a tensor network to simulate a quantum circuit. We start by interpreting the circuit as a ZX-diagram. We then use simplification and local complementation rules to sparsify it. We find that optimizing graph-like ZX-diagrams improves existing state of the art contraction cost by several order of magnitude. In particular, we demonstrate an average contraction cost 1180 times better for Sycamore circuits of depth 20, and up to 4200 times better at peak performance.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02669v1

In this paper, the authors propose a simple and efficient method to reduce the contraction cost of a tensor network for simulating quantum circuits. They start by representing the circuit as a ZX-diagram and then apply simplification and local complementation rules to sparsify it. The authors find that optimizing graph-like ZX-diagrams significantly improves the existing state-of-the-art contraction cost by several orders of magnitude. The motivation behind this research is to better understand the limits of classical simulation of quantum circuits as the field of quantum computing continues to advance. While small circuits can be simulated using direct linear algebra simulation, larger circuits require more sophisticated approaches. The Matrix Product State (MPS) formalism allows for lossy simulation of large quantum systems in shallow circuit regimes, while restricting the set of gates can enable polynomial-time simulation. The authors demonstrate that their method achieves significant improvements in contraction cost compared to existing techniques. For Sycamore circuits with a depth of 20, they achieve an average contraction cost that is 1180 times better than previous methods and up to 4200 times better at peak performance. Overall, this research contributes to advancing the field of quantum circuit simulation by providing a novel approach to reducing contraction costs through graph-like ZX-diagrams. This has implications for improving the efficiency and scalability of simulating complex quantum computations.
Created on 08 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.