As AI tools such as ChatGPT and Bard become increasingly popular, the question arises of whether they should share revenue with their data providers in addition to traditional stakeholders and shareholders. The answer is yes, as large AI tools always require more and better quality data to continuously improve. However, current copyright laws limit their access to various types of data. Sharing revenue between AI tools and their data providers could transform the current hostile zero-sum game relationship into a collaborative and mutually beneficial one that drives forward AI technology and builds a healthy ecosystem. Current revenue-sharing business models do not work for AI tools in the forthcoming AI era since the most widely used metrics for website-based traffic and action will be replaced by new metrics such as prompts and cost per prompt for generative AI tools. A completely new revenue-sharing business model needs to establish a prompt-based scoring system to measure data engagement of each data provider. This paper systematically discusses how to build such a scoring system based on classification and content similarity models, outlining the requirements for third parties or tool developers to build it. The proposed scoring system would encourage more data owners to participate in the revenue-sharing program, creating an environment where all parties benefit. However, this model must be almost independent of AI tools and easily explained to data providers. For example, it could apply not only to large language models but also other types of multimodal AI tools like text-to-image generators or those used in healthcare. In conclusion, sharing revenue with data providers using an effective scoring system would facilitate collaboration among all stakeholders involved in developing exceptional AI tools that reap considerable profits while building a healthy ecosystem. Future work should focus on refining this model further so that it can be applied across different sectors beyond language models.
- AI tools like ChatGPT and Bard need more and better data to get better.
- Sharing money between AI tools and their data providers can help everyone work together and make AI technology better.
- The old way of sharing money doesn't work for new AI tools that use prompts instead of website traffic.
- A new way of sharing money should be based on how much people engage with the data, using a prompt-based scoring system.
- This new way will encourage more people to share their data and help everyone benefit.
Definitions
- AI: Artificial Intelligence, which means computers doing things that normally only humans can do.
- Data: Information that is stored in a computer or other electronic device.
- Revenue: Money earned from selling goods or services.
- Metrics: Measurements used to track progress or success.
- Prompt: A question or statement given to an AI tool to generate a response or output.
Sharing Revenue with Data Providers: A New Business Model for AI Tools
As AI tools become increasingly popular, the question arises of whether they should share revenue with their data providers in addition to traditional stakeholders and shareholders. The answer is yes, as large AI tools always require more and better quality data to continuously improve. However, current copyright laws limit their access to various types of data. Sharing revenue between AI tools and their data providers could transform the current hostile zero-sum game relationship into a collaborative and mutually beneficial one that drives forward AI technology and builds a healthy ecosystem.
Current Revenue-Sharing Models are Inadequate for the Forthcoming AI Era
Current revenue-sharing business models do not work for AI tools in the forthcoming AI era since the most widely used metrics for website-based traffic and action will be replaced by new metrics such as prompts and cost per prompt for generative AI tools. A completely new revenue-sharing business model needs to establish a prompt-based scoring system to measure data engagement of each data provider.
Building an Effective Scoring System
This paper systematically discusses how to build such a scoring system based on classification and content similarity models, outlining the requirements for third parties or tool developers to build it. The proposed scoring system would encourage more data owners to participate in the revenue-sharing program, creating an environment where all parties benefit. However, this model must be almost independent of AI tools and easily explained to data providers. For example, it could apply not only to large language models but also other types of multimodal AI tools like text-to-image generators or those used in healthcare.
Conclusion
In conclusion, sharing revenue with data providers using an effective scoring system would facilitate collaboration among all stakeholders involved in developing exceptional AI tools that reap considerable profits while building a healthy ecosystem. Future work should focus on refining this model further so that it can be applied across different sectors beyond language models.
With various AI tools such as ChatGPT becoming increasingly popular, we are entering a true AI era. We can foresee that exceptional AI tools will soon reap considerable profits. A crucial question arise: should AI tools share revenue with their training data providers in additional to traditional stakeholders and shareholders? The answer is Yes. Large AI tools, such as large language models, always require more and better quality data to continuously improve, but current copyright laws limit their access to various types of data. Sharing revenue between AI tools and their data providers could transform the current hostile zero-sum game relationship between AI tools and a majority of copyrighted data owners into a collaborative and mutually beneficial one, which is necessary to facilitate the development of a virtuous cycle among AI tools, their users and data providers that drives forward AI technology and builds a healthy AI ecosystem. However, current revenue-sharing business models do not work for AI tools in the forthcoming AI era, since the most widely used metrics for website-based traffic and action, such as clicks, will be replaced by new metrics such as prompts and cost per prompt for generative AI tools. A completely new revenue-sharing business model, which must be almost independent of AI tools and be easily explained to data providers, needs to establish a prompt-based scoring system to measure data engagement of each data provider. This paper systematically discusses how to build such a scoring system for all data providers for AI tools based on classification and content similarity models, and outlines the requirements for AI tools or third parties to build it. Sharing revenue with data providers using such a scoring system would encourage more data owners to participate in the revenue-sharing program. This will be a utilitarian AI era where all parties benefit.
