PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of GPT-3.5 to Express Personality Traits and Gender Differences

AI-generated keywords: LLM personas GPT-3.5 personality traits gender differences Human-AI conversations

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study aimed to investigate if personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) can accurately reflect personality traits consistently
  • Used GPT-3.5 to create LLM personas assigned with Big Five personality types and gender roles
  • Created 320 LLM personas for each of the 32 Big Five personality types, with 5 females and 5 males in each group
  • LLM personas' self-reported Big Five Inventory (BFI) scores aligned consistently with their assigned personality types
  • Significant correlations found between assigned personality types and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) psycholinguistic features in writings
  • Differences observed in use of technological and cultural words between female and male LLM-generated personas
  • Research serves as foundational step towards exploring personalized LLMs in Human-AI conversations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Jad Kabbara, Deb Roy

Accepted to 9th International Conference on Computational Social Science (IC2S2)
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in the design of chatbots in various industries and the research showing the importance of personalizing chatbots to cater to different personality traits, little work has been done to evaluate whether the behaviors of personalized LLMs can reflect certain personality traits accurately and consistently. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based simulated agents which refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 (text-davinci-003) to investigate whether LLMs can generate content with consistent, personalized traits when assigned Big Five personality types and gender roles. We created 320 LLM personas (5 females and 5 males for each of the 32 Big Five personality types) and prompted them to complete the classic 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) and then write an 800-word story about their childhood. Results showed that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their assigned personality types, with large effect sizes found on all five traits. Moreover, significant correlations were found between assigned personality types and some Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) psycholinguistic features of their writings. For instance, extroversion is associated with pro-social and active words, and neuroticism is associated with words related to negative emotions and mental health. Besides, we only found significant differences in using technological and cultural words in writing between LLM-generated female and male personas. This work provides a first step for further research on personalized LLMs and their applications in Human-AI conversation.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02547v1

The study "PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of GPT-3.5 to Express Personality Traits and Gender Differences" conducted by Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Jad Kabbara, and Deb Roy from MIT Media Lab and Stanford Graduate School aimed to address the gap in research regarding whether personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) can accurately reflect certain personality traits consistently. The researchers focused on studying LLM-based simulated agents known as LLM personas and conducted a case study using GPT-3.5 (text-davinci-003) to explore if LLMs could generate content with consistent personalized traits when assigned Big Five personality types and gender roles. To conduct the study, 320 LLM personas were created for each of the 32 Big Five personality types, with 5 females and 5 males represented in each group. These personas were prompted to complete the classic 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) and then write an 800-word story about their childhood. The results showed that the self-reported BFI scores of the LLM personas aligned consistently with their assigned personality types, demonstrating large effect sizes across all five traits. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the assigned personality types of the LLM personas and some Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) psycholinguistic features present in their writings. For example, extroversion was associated with pro-social and active words while neuroticism correlated with words related to negative emotions and mental health. Additionally, notable differences were observed in the use of technological and cultural words between female and male LLM-generated personas. This research serves as a foundational step towards further exploration of personalized LLMs and their potential applications in Human-AI conversations. The findings contribute valuable insights into how LLMs can effectively express personality traits while also shedding light on gender differences in generated content. This study was accepted for presentation at the 9th International Conference on Computational Social Science (IC2S2), held from July 17-20, 2023 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Created on 30 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.