Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02301v1

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) presents challenges due to their memory inefficiency and compute-intensive nature for practical applications. To address this, researchers have trained smaller task-specific models using either finetuning with human labels or distillation using LLM-generated labels. However, both methods require large amounts of training data to achieve comparable performance to LLMs. In response, a new mechanism called Distilling step-by-step has been introduced that trains smaller models that outperform LLMs while leveraging less training data than finetuning or distillation. The method extracts LLM rationales as additional supervision for small models within a multi-task training framework. The study conducted experiments across four NLP benchmarks and presented three key findings. Firstly, compared to both finetuning and distillation, the Distilling step-by-step mechanism achieved better performance with much fewer labeled/unlabeled training examples. Secondly, compared to LLMs, the method achieved better performance using substantially smaller model sizes. Thirdly, the study reduced both the model size and the amount of data required to outperform LLMs; their 770M T5 model outperformed the 540B PaLM model using only 80% of available data on a benchmark task. The authors of this study include Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alexander Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee and Tomas Pfister. Their research paper titled "Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes" was accepted for publication in Findings of ACL 2023.

• - Large language models (LLMs) are memory inefficient and compute-intensive for practical applications
• - Smaller task-specific models have been trained using finetuning or distillation, but both methods require large amounts of training data to achieve comparable performance to LLMs
• - A new mechanism called Distilling step-by-step has been introduced that trains smaller models that outperform LLMs while leveraging less training data than finetuning or distillation
• - The method extracts LLM rationales as additional supervision for small models within a multi-task training framework
• - Experiments across four NLP benchmarks showed that the Distilling step-by-step mechanism achieved better performance with much fewer labeled/unlabeled training examples compared to both finetuning and distillation
• - The method achieved better performance using substantially smaller model sizes compared to LLMs
• - The study reduced both the model size and the amount of data required to outperform LLMs; their 770M T5 model outperformed the 540B PaLM model using only 80% of available data on a benchmark task.
• - Authors of this study include Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alexander Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee and Tomas Pfister.

Large language models (LLMs) are computer programs that can understand and generate human language, but they require a lot of memory and computing power. People have made smaller models that are better for specific tasks, but it takes a lot of training data to make them work well. A new way of training these smaller models has been invented called Distilling step-by-step. This method uses the big LLMs to help train the smaller ones so they can do better with less data. The people who made this method did experiments and found out that it works really well! They used less data and made smaller models that were even better than the big LLMs.

Distilling Step-by-Step: Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) presents challenges due to their memory inefficiency and compute-intensive nature for practical applications. To address this, researchers have trained smaller task-specific models using either finetuning with human labels or distillation using LLM-generated labels. However, both methods require large amounts of training data to achieve comparable performance to LLMs. In response, a new mechanism called Distilling step-by-step has been introduced that trains smaller models that outperform LLMs while leveraging less training data than finetuning or distillation. This research paper was accepted for publication in Findings of ACL 2023 by Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alexander Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee and Tomas Pfister.

Background

LLMs are powerful tools for natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as question answering and text classification but they come with the cost of high computational requirements which makes them difficult to deploy on edge devices or low powered systems. To reduce the complexity of these models without sacrificing accuracy there have been two main approaches used: finetuning with human labels or distillation using LLM generated labels. Finetuning requires a large amount of labeled data which is not always available while distillation requires a lot of unlabeled data which can be expensive to acquire at scale.

Distilling Step by Step Methodology

In order to overcome these limitations the authors propose a new method called Distilling step by step (DSS). The DSS approach leverages an additional source of supervision from rationales extracted from an LLM’s predictions during multi task training framework; it does not require any additional labeled/unlabeled datasets beyond what is needed for finetuning/distillation methods. The rationale extraction process involves extracting only those words that contribute most towards the model's prediction; this allows the model to focus on learning only those parts that are important rather than trying to learn everything from scratch as required in other methods like finetuning/distillation.

Experiments & Results

To evaluate their proposed method the authors conducted experiments across four NLP benchmarks including GLUE benchmark tasks (CoLA , MNLI , QQP , RTE ) . Their results showed three key findings : 1) Compared to both finetuning and distillation , DSS achieved better performance with much fewer labeled/unlabeled training examples . 2) Compared to LLMs , DSS achieved better performance using substantially smaller model sizes . 3) They were able reduce both the model size and amount of data required compared to other methods ; their 770M T5 model outperformed 540B PaLM model using only 80% available data on one benchmark task .

Conclusion

This study demonstrated how Distilling step by step can be used as an effective alternative approach for reducing computational complexity while maintaining accuracy when deploying large language models in practical applications . It also shows how leveraging rationales extracted from an existing larger language model can help reduce both the number of parameters needed as well as amount of training dataset required compared traditional approaches like fine tuning /distillation .