Constrain the Dark Matter Distribution of Ultra-diffuse Galaxies with Globular-Cluster Mass Segregation: A Case Study with NGC5846-UDG1
AI-generated Key Points
- The study explores the potential of using globular clusters (GCs) to constrain the dark matter content of ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs).
- NGC5846-UDG1 is a UDG with a GC population that exhibits strong radial mass segregation, which indicates dynamical-friction-driven orbital decay.
- The authors develop a semi-analytical model of GC evolution to follow the effects of dynamical friction, tidal evolution, and two-body relaxation.
- Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations, they forward-model the GCs in an NGC5846-UDG1-like potential to match observed GC mass, size, and spatial distributions while constraining the profile of the host halo and origin of the GCs.
- The results indicate that NGC5846-UDG1 is dark matter poor compared to what is expected from stellar to halo mass relations. Its halo concentration is low regardless of whether it has a cuspy or cored halo profile.
- Additionally, its GC population has an initial spatial distribution more extended than its smooth stellar distribution.
- These findings suggest caution against naively using the GC abundance halo mass relation to infer halo mass in UDGs.
- The authors provide their semi-analytical model as publicly available code applicable to other GC rich dwarf galaxies.
Authors: Jinning Liang (Wuhan University), Fangzhou Jiang (KIAA, Peking University), Shany Danieli (Princeton University), Andrew Benson (Carnegie Observatories), Phil Hopkins (TAPIR, Caltech)
Abstract: The properties of globular clusters (GCs) contain valuable information of their host galaxies and dark-matter halos. In the remarkable example of ultra-diffuse galaxy, NGC5846-UDG1, the GC population exhibits strong radial mass segregation, indicative of dynamical-friction-driven orbital decay, which opens the possibility of using imaging data alone to constrain the dark-matter content of the galaxy. To explore this possibility, we develop a semi-analytical model of GC evolution, which starts from the initial mass function, the initial structure-mass relation, and the initial spatial distribution of the GC progenitors, and follows the effects of dynamical friction, tidal evolution, and two-body relaxation. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we forward-model the GCs in a NGC5846-UDG1-like potential to match the observed GC mass, size, and spatial distributions, and to constrain the profile of the host halo and the origin of the GCs. We find that, with the assumptions of zero mass segregation when the star clusters were born, NGC5846-UDG1 is dark-matter poor compared to what is expected from stellar-to-halo-mass relations, and its halo concentration is low, irrespective of having a cuspy or a cored halo profile. Its GC population has an initial spatial distribution more extended than the smooth stellar distribution. We discuss the results in the context of scaling laws of galaxy-halo connections, and warn against naively using the GC-abundance-halo-mass relation to infer the halo mass of UDGs. Our model is generally applicable to GC-rich dwarf galaxies, and is publicly available at https://github.com/JiangFangzhou/GCevo.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.