We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity
AI-generated Key Points
- Ambiguity is a well-known issue in natural language processing (NLP).
- Managing ambiguity is crucial for effective communication.
- Language models (LMs) are increasingly used as dialogue interfaces and writing aids, making handling ambiguous language even more critical to their success.
- Researchers have characterized ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence and developed AmbiEnt, a linguist-annotated benchmark of 1,645 examples with diverse kinds of ambiguity.
- The team designed a suite of tests based on AmbiEnt, presenting the first evaluation of pretrained LMs to recognize ambiguity and disentangle possible meanings.
- The results show that the task remains extremely challenging, including for the recent GPT-4 model.
- The generated disambiguations are considered correct only 32% of the time in human evaluation compared to 90% for disambiguations in their dataset.
- A multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity.
- Despite its limitations, the strongest model from their study can not only recover claims flagged by fact-checkers as ambiguous but also highlight previously unidentified ambiguous claims.
- Sensitivity to ambiguity is lacking in our ever-larger models and understanding it could bring value to NLP tasks.
- Researchers should rediscover the importance of ambiguity for NLP and develop more sophisticated models capable of managing it effectively.
Authors: Alisa Liu, Zhaofeng Wu, Julian Michael, Alane Suhr, Peter West, Alexander Koller, Swabha Swayamdipta, Noah A. Smith, Yejin Choi
Abstract: Ambiguity is an intrinsic feature of natural language. Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding, allowing us to anticipate misunderstanding as communicators and revise our interpretations as listeners. As language models (LMs) are increasingly employed as dialogue interfaces and writing aids, handling ambiguous language is critical to their success. We characterize ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence, and collect AmbiEnt, a linguist-annotated benchmark of 1,645 examples with diverse kinds of ambiguity. We design a suite of tests based on AmbiEnt, presenting the first evaluation of pretrained LMs to recognize ambiguity and disentangle possible meanings. We find that the task remains extremely challenging, including for the recent GPT-4, whose generated disambiguations are considered correct only 32% of the time in human evaluation, compared to 90% for disambiguations in our dataset. Finally, to illustrate the value of ambiguity-sensitive tools, we show that a multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity. We encourage the field to rediscover the importance of ambiguity for NLP.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.