Creating Large Language Model Resistant Exams: Guidelines and Strategies

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT may impact academic integrity in exams due to their lack of genuine comprehension.
  • Educators need to adapt examination design to maintain assessment integrity and promote essential skills development in students.
  • Traditional evaluation methods based on long-form essays may need reconsideration due to advancements in LLMs.
  • Exams that do not incorporate modern tools can become inauthentic and fail to represent real-life problem-solving workflows.
  • Guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams include content moderation, misdirecting AI models with deliberate inaccuracies, evaluating real-world scenarios beyond the LLM’s knowledge base, developing effective distractor options, and incorporating non-textual information in examinations.
  • Soft skills such as communication, collaboration, leadership, and critical thinking should be emphasized as they are beyond the scope of LLM capabilities.
  • By implementing these strategies and shifting the focus towards students’ engagement and comprehension rather than just their ability to produce long-form essays or answer multiple-choice questions accurately while using an LLM tool; educators can create exams that are more resistant to LLM intervention while ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of students’ knowledge and skills.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Simon kaare Larsen

License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has raised concerns about their potential impact on academic integrity, prompting the need for LLM-resistant exam designs. This article investigates the performance of LLMs on exams and their implications for assessment, focusing on ChatGPT's abilities and limitations. We propose guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams, including content moderation, deliberate inaccuracies, real-world scenarios beyond the model's knowledge base, effective distractor options, evaluating soft skills, and incorporating non-textual information. The article also highlights the significance of adapting assessments to modern tools and promoting essential skills development in students. By adopting these strategies, educators can maintain academic integrity while ensuring that assessments accurately reflect contemporary professional settings and address the challenges and opportunities posed by artificial intelligence in education.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.12203v1

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has raised concerns about their potential impact on academic integrity, particularly in the context of exams. While LLMs can generate sophisticated text and perform well in certain situations, their lack of genuine comprehension may result in superficial or erroneous responses. As LLMs continue to evolve and gain prominence, it is crucial for educators to adapt examination design to maintain assessment integrity and promote essential skills development in students. Traditionally, students have been evaluated based on their ability to write long-form essays. However, given the advancements in LLMs and their potential to assist in producing sophisticated written content, it may be time for educators to reconsider this approach. Moreover, exams that do not incorporate modern tools can become inauthentic, failing to represent how professionals would solve problems in real life. By excluding such tools within exams, educators may inadvertently force students to learn and employ outdated problem-solving methods that do not reflect a modern workflow. To address these challenges, this article proposes guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams. These include safeguarding through content moderation, misdirecting AI models with deliberate inaccuracies, evaluating real-world scenarios beyond the LLM’s knowledge base, developing effective distractor options, and incorporating non-textual information in examinations. The article also highlights the importance of emphasizing soft skills such as communication, collaboration, leadership, and critical thinking which are beyond the scope of LLM capabilities. By implementing these strategies and shifting the focus towards students’ engagement and comprehension rather than just their ability to produce long-form essays or answer multiple-choice questions accurately while using an LLM tool; educators can create exams that are more resistant to LLM intervention while ensuring a fair and accurate assessment of students’ knowledge and skills. In doing so they will not only safeguard the integrity of the academic environment but also contribute to ongoing efforts aimed at addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence's increasing prevalence in education. In conclusion, this article emphasizes that adapting assessments to include modern tools and promoting essential skills development in students is crucial. By adopting the proposed guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams; educators can maintain academic integrity while ensuring that assessments accurately reflect contemporary professional settings and address the challenges and opportunities posed by artificial intelligence (AI)in education.
Created on 25 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.