Rethinking Benchmarks for Cross-modal Image-text Retrieval
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Image-text retrieval is an important aspect of information retrieval.
- The primary challenge in this task is cross-modal semantic understanding and matching.
- Recent research has focused on fine-grained cross-modal semantic matching, made possible by large-scale multimodal pretraining models.
- State-of-the-art models like X-VLM have achieved near-perfect performance on widely used image-text retrieval benchmarks like MSCOCO Test 5K and Flickr30K Test 1K.
- However, these benchmarks are insufficient to assess the true capability of models on fine-grained cross modal semantic matching due to the coarse grained nature of a large portion of images and texts in these benchmarks.
- To address this issue, the authors propose renovating the coarse grained images and texts in existing benchmarks to establish improved benchmarks called MSCOCO FG and Flickr30K FG.
- The authors evaluate representative image text retrieval models on their new benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of their method while also analyzing model capabilities for fine-grained semantic comprehension through extensive experiments.
- The results reveal that even state-of-the-art models have much room for improvement in fine-grained semantic understanding, particularly when distinguishing attributes of close objects in images.
- This paper's contribution lies in its proposal for improved benchmarks that better reflect real-world scenarios where fine-grained cross modal semantic matching is necessary, highlighting areas where current state-of-the-art models fall short and providing a foundation for future research in this field.
Authors: Weijing Chen, Linli Yao, Qin Jin
Abstract: Image-text retrieval, as a fundamental and important branch of information retrieval, has attracted extensive research attentions. The main challenge of this task is cross-modal semantic understanding and matching. Some recent works focus more on fine-grained cross-modal semantic matching. With the prevalence of large scale multimodal pretraining models, several state-of-the-art models (e.g. X-VLM) have achieved near-perfect performance on widely-used image-text retrieval benchmarks, i.e. MSCOCO-Test-5K and Flickr30K-Test-1K. In this paper, we review the two common benchmarks and observe that they are insufficient to assess the true capability of models on fine-grained cross-modal semantic matching. The reason is that a large amount of images and texts in the benchmarks are coarse-grained. Based on the observation, we renovate the coarse-grained images and texts in the old benchmarks and establish the improved benchmarks called MSCOCO-FG and Flickr30K-FG. Specifically, on the image side, we enlarge the original image pool by adopting more similar images. On the text side, we propose a novel semi-automatic renovation approach to refine coarse-grained sentences into finer-grained ones with little human effort. Furthermore, we evaluate representative image-text retrieval models on our new benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We also analyze the capability of models on fine-grained semantic comprehension through extensive experiments. The results show that even the state-of-the-art models have much room for improvement in fine-grained semantic understanding, especially in distinguishing attributes of close objects in images. Our code and improved benchmark datasets are publicly available at: https://github.com/cwj1412/MSCOCO-Flikcr30K_FG, which we hope will inspire further in-depth research on cross-modal retrieval.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.