Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Answering Questions Faithfully?

AI-generated keywords: ChatGPT Faithfulness Knowledge Memorization Knowledge Association Knowledge Reasoning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models like ChatGPT have potential to impact various aspects of human life
  • ChatGPT faces challenges in faithfulness
  • In the paper "Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Answering Questions Faithfully?", authors analyze the failures of ChatGPT in complex open-domain question answering and identify abilities under the failures
  • The authors categorize ChatGPT's failures into four types: comprehension, factualness, specificity, and inference
  • Three critical abilities associated with QA failures are identified: knowledge memorization, knowledge association, and knowledge reasoning
  • Experiments are conducted centered on these abilities to enhance faithfulness
  • Furnishing the model with fine-grained external knowledge, hints for knowledge association and guidance for reasoning can empower the model to answer questions more faithfully
  • This research provides insights into improving language models' performance in open-domain question answering tasks by addressing their limitations related to faithfulness.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shen Zheng, Jie Huang, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang

Preprint in progress

Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated significant potential to impact various aspects of human life. However, ChatGPT still faces challenges in aspects like faithfulness. Taking question answering as a representative application, we seek to understand why ChatGPT falls short in answering questions faithfully. To address this question, we attempt to analyze the failures of ChatGPT in complex open-domain question answering and identifies the abilities under the failures. Specifically, we categorize ChatGPT's failures into four types: comprehension, factualness, specificity, and inference. We further pinpoint three critical abilities associated with QA failures: knowledge memorization, knowledge association, and knowledge reasoning. Additionally, we conduct experiments centered on these abilities and propose potential approaches to enhance faithfulness. The results indicate that furnishing the model with fine-grained external knowledge, hints for knowledge association, and guidance for reasoning can empower the model to answer questions more faithfully.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.10513v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The recent advancements in Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, have shown significant potential to impact various aspects of human life. However, ChatGPT still faces challenges in aspects like faithfulness. In this paper titled "Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Answering Questions Faithfully? ", authors Shen Zheng, Jie Huang, and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang attempt to analyze the failures of ChatGPT in complex open-domain question answering and identify the abilities under the failures. The authors categorize ChatGPT's failures into four types: comprehension, factualness, specificity, and inference. They further pinpoint three critical abilities associated with QA failures: knowledge memorization, knowledge association and knowledge reasoning. The study conducts experiments centered on these abilities and proposes potential approaches to enhance faithfulness. The results indicate that furnishing the model with fine-grained external knowledge, hints for knowledge association and guidance for reasoning can empower the model to answer questions more faithfully. This research is crucial as it provides insights into improving language models' performance in open-domain question-answering tasks by addressing their limitations related to faithfulness.
Created on 21 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.